Variable kinship patterns in Neolithic Anatolia revealed by ancient genomes.
Variable kinship patterns in Neolithic Anatolia revealed by ancient genomes.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.050
复制
发表时间：
2021-06-07
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Somel M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Yaka R;Mapelli I;Kaptan D;Doğu A;Chyleński M;Erdal ÖD;Koptekin D;Vural KB;Bayliss A;Mazzucato C;Fer E;Çokoğlu SS;Lagerholm VK;Krzewińska M;Karamurat C;Gemici HC;Sevkar A;Dağtaş ND;Kılınç GM;Adams D;Munters AR;Sağlıcan E;Milella M;Schotsmans EMJ;Yurtman E;Çetin M;Yorulmaz S;Altınışık NE;Ghalichi A;Juras A;Bilgin CC;Günther T;Storå J;Jakobsson M;de Kleijn M;Mustafaoğlu G;Fairbairn A;Pearson J;Togan İ;Kayacan N;Marciniak A;Larsen CS;Hodder I;Atakuman Ç;Pilloud M;Sürer E;Gerritsen F;Özbal R;Baird D;Erdal YS;Duru G;Özbaşaran M;Haddow SD;Knüsel CJ;Götherström A;Özer F;Somel M
西南亚新石器时代出现的第一批完全定居社会的社会组织仍然是个谜，主要是因为物质文化研究对这个问题的了解有限。然而，由于新石器时代的安纳托利亚社区经常将死者埋在家庭建筑下，因此可以通过这些人类遗骸来研究家庭组成和社会结构。在这里，我们使用59个古代基因组，包括来自Aşıklı Höyük和Çatalhöyük的22个新基因组，描述了新石器时代安纳托利亚与住宅建筑相关的共葬者之间的遗传关系。我们通过同时分析多种类型的信息来推断家系关系，包括常染色体和X染色体亲缘关系系数、母体标记和放射性碳定年。在两个可追溯到公元前9千年和8千年的新石器时代早期村庄Aşıklı Höyük和Boncuklu，我们发现兄弟姐妹和父母-后代配对在家庭结构中很频繁，这为共同埋葬之间密切的遗传关系提供了第一个直接的迹象。相比之下，在公元前7千年的Çatalhöyük和Barcın遗址中，我们研究了房屋内和周围的亚成虫，我们发现近亲很少。因此，遗传亲缘关系可能在后两个地点的埋葬地点选择中没有发挥主要作用，至少对亚成虫来说是这样。这支持了一个假设，即在Çatalhöyük，可能在其他一些新石器时代的社区，家庭结构可能是由生物上不相关的个体组成的社会单位的埋葬地点。我们的研究结果强调了在社会文化发展的这一重要阶段，新石器时代社区近亲结构的多样性。近亲在Aşıklı和Boncuklu的共葬中很常见。在西南亚的Çatalhöyük和Barcın的新石器时代社会中，在同一栋建筑中发现的许多没有血缘关系的婴儿可能拥有不同的亲属概念。Yaka等人利用新石器时代安纳托利亚的古代基因组，为新石器时代社会的不同社会亲属概念提供了证据。在一些社区，比如Çatalhöyük，许多没有血缘关系的婴儿被葬在同一栋建筑里，而在其他地方，人们被葬在一起往往是近亲。
The social organization of the first fully sedentary societies that emerged during the Neolithic period in Southwest Asia remains enigmatic, mainly because material culture studies provide limited insight into this issue. However, because Neolithic Anatolian communities often buried their dead beneath domestic buildings, household composition and social structure can be studied through these human remains. Here, we describe genetic relatedness among co-burials associated with domestic buildings in Neolithic Anatolia using 59 ancient genomes, including 22 new genomes from Aşıklı Höyük and Çatalhöyük. We infer pedigree relationships by simultaneously analyzing multiple types of information, including autosomal and X chromosome kinship coefficients, maternal markers, and radiocarbon dating. In two early Neolithic villages dating to the 9th and 8th millennia BCE, Aşıklı Höyük and Boncuklu, we discover that siblings and parent-offspring pairings were frequent within domestic structures, which provides the first direct indication of close genetic relationships among co-burials. In contrast, in the 7th millennium BCE sites of Çatalhöyük and Barcın, where we study subadults interred within and around houses, we find close genetic relatives to be rare. Hence, genetic relatedness may not have played a major role in the choice of burial location at these latter two sites, at least for subadults. This supports the hypothesis that in Çatalhöyük, and possibly in some other Neolithic communities, domestic structures may have served as burial location for social units incorporating biologically unrelated individuals. Our results underscore the diversity of kin structures in Neolithic communities during this important phase of sociocultural development. Genetic kinship estimated from co-buried individuals’ genomes in Neolithic Anatolia Close relatives are common among co-burials in Aşıklı and Boncuklu Many unrelated infants found buried in the same building in Çatalhöyük and Barcın Neolithic societies in Southwest Asia may have held diverse concepts of kinship Yaka et al. use ancient genomes from Neolithic Anatolia and present evidence for diverse concepts of social kinship in Neolithic societies. In some communities, like Çatalhöyük, many genetically unrelated infants were buried together inside the same buildings, whereas in other sites, people buried together were frequently close biological kin.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2
作者：
Bayliss, Alex;Brock, Fiona;Taylor, R. E.
通讯作者：
Taylor, R. E.
DOI：
10.1016/j.nimb.2009.10.061
发表时间：
2010-04-01
影响因子：
1.3
作者：
Beaumont, Will;Beverly, Robert;Taylor, R. E.
通讯作者：
Taylor, R. E.
影响因子：
5.8
作者：
Behr, Aaron A.;Liu, Katherine Z.;Ramachandran, Sohini
通讯作者：
Ramachandran, Sohini
影响因子：
2
作者：
Atakuman, Cigdem
通讯作者：
Atakuman, Cigdem
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.1800163115
发表时间：
2018-04-03
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Baird, Douglas;Fairbairn, Andrew;Elliott, Sarah
通讯作者：
Elliott, Sarah