Financing sustainable development? The role of foreign aid in Southeast Asia's energy transition

Financing sustainable development? The role of foreign aid in Southeast Asia's energy transition
复制标题

为可持续发展融资?

DOI:
10.1002/sd.2231
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
12.5
通讯作者:
Lindner Robert
Lindner Robert
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bertheau Paul;Lindner Robert

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在快速增长的东南亚地区快速部署现代可再生能源发电能力对于确保该地区能够以可持续的方式满足未来日益增长的能源需求至关重要。然而,许多国家需要通过国际合作和外援来发展其可持续能源。日本、韩国和中国这三个东亚捐助国尤其重要,因为它们占该地区援助支出的很大一部分,并成为许多受援国的发展榜样。这三个国家都是《巴黎协定》和《2030年可持续发展议程》的签署国,致力于实现气候保护和可持续能源发展的全球目标。本文基于对官方援助数据库和第二方数据的分析,探讨了过去 15 年中三个主要援助国对东南亚能源相关援助贡献的细节。调查结果表明,这三个国家通过为该地区许多国家的化石燃料发电项目提供资金而违背了自己的国际承诺。尽管日本和韩国最近的政策变化令人乐观,但中国能源相关援助的不透明,加上对国内煤炭发电的重新支持,对东南亚及其他地区的能源发展的未来来说是令人担忧的迹象。
The rapid deployment of modern renewable energy generation capacity in the fast‐growing Southeast Asian region will be crucial to ensure that the region can meet its increasing future energy demand in a sustainable way. However, many countries will need assistance through international cooperation and foreign aid to develop their sustainable energy sources. The three East Asian donor states Japan, South Korea and China are particularly crucial because they account for a large share of aid disbursement to the region and serve as development role models for many recipient countries. All three states are signatories of the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and thus committed to the global goals of climate protection and sustainable energy development. This paper is based on an analysis of official aid databases and second‐party data to explore the details of the energy‐related aid contributions of the three key donor states to Southeast Asia during the last 15 years. The findings indicate that all three states contradicted their own international pledges by financing fossil‐fuel power generation projects in many countries in the region. Although recent policy changes in Japan and South Korea are cause for optimism, the opacity of China's energy‐related aid flows combined with its renewed support for domestic coal power generation are worrying signs for the future of energy development in Southeast Asia and beyond.
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.016
发表时间: 2016-12
影响因子: 6.7
作者:
F. Kern;Karoline S. Rogge
通讯作者: F. Kern;Karoline S. Rogge
日本、韩国和中国:东亚 ODA 的类型
DOI: --
发表时间: 2016
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
B. Stallings;Eun Mee Kim
通讯作者: Eun Mee Kim
以俱乐部为基础的气候制度与经合组织关于限制煤电出口融资的谈判
DOI: --
发表时间: 2021
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Jessica C. Liao
通讯作者: Jessica C. Liao
社会创新与中国海外水电大坝:国家社会政策与企业社会责任的关系
DOI: 10.1002/sd.1591
发表时间: 2015
影响因子: 12.5
作者:
Johan Nordensvard;F. Urban;Grace Mang
通讯作者: Grace Mang
DOI: 10.1177/0192512120924741
发表时间: 2020
影响因子: 2.2
作者:
T. Kalinowski
通讯作者: T. Kalinowski