Differences by sex, ear, and sexual orientation in the time intervals between successive peaks in auditory evoked potentials.

Differences by sex, ear, and sexual orientation in the time intervals between successive peaks in auditory evoked potentials.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.heares.2010.09.008
复制
发表时间:
2010-12-01
期刊:
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
Champlin, Craig A.
Champlin, Craig A.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
McFadden, Dennis;Hsieh, Michelle D.;Garcia-Sierra, Adrian;Champlin, Craig A.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

重新分析了最初设计用于其他目的的两项研究的听觉诱发电位(AEP)数据。检测听性脑干反应(ABR)、中潜伏期反应(MLR)和长潜伏期反应(LLR)。测量每个受试者的每个喀喇音呈现耳朵的几个峰中的每一个的潜伏期,并计算连续峰之间的时间间隔。有趣的是,两性之间、不同性取向的人之间以及两耳刺激之间的峰间间隔存在差异。获得的大多数差异都很小。最大的性别差异是ABR的I → V间期和LLR的N1 → N2间期(效应量> 0.6)。异性恋者和非异性恋者之间的最大差异是两种性别的波I的潜伏期,女性的Na→ Nb间期,以及男性的V → Na和Nb → N1间期(效应量> 0.3)。在异性恋女性中,耳刺激的最大差异是间隔N1 → N2(效应量~0.5)。使用和不使用口服避孕药的妇女之间的AEP间期没有实质性差异。峰间间隔的左/右相关性大多在约0.4和0.6之间。同侧间隔之间的相关性很小;即,AEP系列早期的间期长度对系列后期的间期长度没有高度的预测性。峰间间隔通常比原始数据提供的关于性别和性取向差异的信息少。
Auditory-evoked-potential (AEP) data from two studies originally designed for other purposes were reanalyzed. The auditory brainstem response (ABR), middle-latency response (MLR), and long-latency response (LLR) were measured. The latencies to each of several peaks were measured for each subject for each ear of click presentation, and the time intervals between successive peaks were calculated. Of interest were differences in interpeak intervals between the sexes, between people of differing sexual orientations, and between the two ears of stimulation. Most of the differences obtained were small. The largest sex differences were for interval I → V in the ABR and interval N1 → N2 of the LLR (effect sizes > 0.6). The largest differences between heterosexuals and nonheterosexuals were for the latency to Wave I in both sexes, for the interval Na→ Nb in females, and for intervals V → Na and Nb → N1 in males (effect sizes > 0.3). The largest difference for ear stimulated was for interval N1 → N2 in heterosexual females (effect size ~0.5). No substantial differences were found in the AEP intervals between women using, and not using, oral contraceptives. Left/right correlations for the interpeak intervals were mostly between about 0.4 and 0.6. Correlations between the ipsilateral intervals were small; i.e., interval length early in the AEP series was not highly predictive of interval length later in the series. Interpeak intervals appear generally less informative than raw latencies about differences by sex and by sexual orientation.
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(79)90164-0
发表时间: 1979-01-01
期刊: ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
影响因子: --
作者:
FABIANI, M;SOHMER, H;KINARTI, R
通讯作者: KINARTI, R
DOI: 10.1016/s0194-5998(94)70791-x
发表时间: 1994-01-01
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
ELKINDHIRSCH, KE;WALLACE, E;JERGER, JJ
通讯作者: JERGER, JJ
DOI: 10.3109/00207458308985878
发表时间: 1983-01-01
影响因子: 2.2
作者:
EDWARDS, RM;SQUIRES, NK;TANGUAY, PE
通讯作者: TANGUAY, PE
DOI: 10.3109/03005367809078858
发表时间: 1978-08-01
期刊: British journal of audiology
影响因子: --
作者:
Beagley, H A;Sheldrake, J B
通讯作者: Sheldrake, J B
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90112-0
发表时间: 1994-11-01
期刊: HEARING RESEARCH
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
COLEMAN, JR;CAMPBELL, D;MOYER, J
通讯作者: MOYER, J