Development and Validation of an Eating-Related Eco-Concern Questionnaire.
Development and Validation of an Eating-Related Eco-Concern Questionnaire.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3390/nu14214517
复制
发表时间：
2022-10-27
期刊：
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
Munn-Chernoff, Melissa A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Qi, Baiyu;Presseller, Emily K.;Cooper, Gabrielle E.;Kapadia, Avantika;Dumain, Alexis S.;Jayawickreme, Shantal M.;Bulik-Sullivan, Emily C.;van Furth, Eric F.;Thornton, Laura M.;Bulik, Cynthia M.;Munn-Chernoff, Melissa A.
生态关注，与气候变化有关的痛苦经历，与心理健康有关，但没有研究检查与生态关注有关的饮食失调。本研究开发并验证了一个10项量表评估饮食相关的生态关注（EREC）。参与者（n = 224）完成了EREC，气候变化担忧量表（CCWS）和饮食失调检查问卷（EDE-Q）。结构效度，收敛效度和内部一致性进行了评价。使用t检验评价EREC的性别差异。使用线性回归模型评估EREC、CCWS和EDE-Q之间的关联。在低于EDE-Q总体评分临床临界值的个体中进行敏感性分析。因子分析表明，所有项目充分加载到一个因素。Pearson相关分析和Bland-Altman分析表明EREC和CCWS之间具有较强的相关性和可接受的一致性（r = 0.57），但与EDE-Q总体评分的相关性较弱且一致性较低（r = 0.14）。EREC具有可接受的内部一致性（α = 0.88）。在整个样本中，EREC没有观察到性别差异;在敏感性分析中，女性的平均得分显著高于男性。EREC与CCWS和EDE-Q整体和形状关注评分显著正相关，但在敏感性分析中不相关。EREC是一个简短的，经过验证的规模，可以用于筛选与饮食相关的生态问题。
Eco-concern, the distress experienced relating to climate change, is associated with mental health, yet no study has examined disordered eating related to eco-concern. This study developed and validated a 10-item scale assessing Eating-Related Eco-Concern (EREC). Participants (n = 224) completed the EREC, Climate Change Worry Scale (CCWS), and Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Construct validity, convergent validity, and internal consistency were evaluated. Sex differences in EREC were evaluated using t-tests. Associations among the EREC, CCWS, and EDE-Q were evaluated using linear regression models. Sensitivity analyses were conducted in individuals below EDE-Q global score clinical cut-offs. Factor analysis suggested that all items loaded adequately onto one factor. Pearson’s correlation and Bland–Altman analyses suggested strong correlation and acceptable agreement between the EREC and CCWS (r = 0.57), but weak correlation and low agreement with the EDE-Q global score (r = 0.14). The EREC had acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.88). No sex difference was observed in the EREC in the full sample; females had a significantly higher mean score than males in sensitivity analysis. The EREC was significantly positively associated with the CCWS and EDE-Q global and shape concern scores, but not in sensitivity analysis. The EREC is a brief, validated scale that can be useful to screen for eating-related eco-concern.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.32641/rchped.vi91i5.2143
发表时间：
2020-10-01
期刊：
Revista chilena de pediatría
影响因子：
--
作者：
Aravena, Javiera;Zubarew, Tamara;Urrejola, Pascuala
通讯作者：
Urrejola, Pascuala
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Aardoom, Jiska J.;Dingemans, Alexandra E.;Van Furth, Eric F.
通讯作者：
Van Furth, Eric F.
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Carter, JC;Stewart, DA;Fairburn, CG
通讯作者：
Fairburn, CG
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph18094486
发表时间：
2021-04-23
影响因子：
--
作者：
Charlson F;Ali S;Benmarhnia T;Pearl M;Massazza A;Augustinavicius J;Scott JG
通讯作者：
Scott JG
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
Brulle, Robert J.;Carmichael, Jason;Jenkins, J. Craig
通讯作者：
Jenkins, J. Craig