Creativity in design teams: the influence of personality traits and risk attitudes on creative concept selection
Creativity in design teams: the influence of personality traits and risk attitudes on creative concept selection
复制标题
设计团队的创造力：个性特征和风险态度对创意概念选择的影响
DOI：
10.1007/s00163-015-0207-y
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Miller, Scarlett R.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Toh, Christine A.;Miller, Scarlett R.
概念选择被认为是设计过程的重要组成部分，主要涉及设计团队内的非正式小组讨论。然而，人们对于在此过程中影响创意想法的选择或过滤的因素却知之甚少。这是有问题的，因为为了实现创新，个人必须首先识别并选择在设计早期阶段开发的创意概念。然而，先前的研究表明，由于与创意概念相关的固有风险，个人倾向于在此过程中选择传统的替代方案。因此，本研究的目的是了解人格特质、风险态度和创意生成能力如何影响团队环境中创意的推广或过滤。我们对工科学生的实证研究结果表明，责任心、随和性和模糊容忍度较高的团队更容易选择新颖的概念。此外，结果显示，产生创意的团队不一定在概念选择时选择创意。这些结果增加了我们对概念选择过程中基于团队的决策的理解，并使我们能够为在此过程中增加创意流动提供指导。
Concept selection is recognized as a crucial component of the design process that largely involves informal group discussions within design teams. However, little is known about what factors affect the selection or filtering of creative ideas during this process. This is problematic because in order for innovation to occur, individuals must first identify and select the creative concepts developed in the early stages of design. However, prior research has shown that individuals tend to select conventional alternatives during this process due to the inherent risk associated with creative concepts. Therefore, the current study was developed to understand how personality traits, risk attitudes, and idea generation abilities impact the promotion or filtering of creative ideas in a team setting. The results from our empirical study with engineering students reveal that teams who have higher levels of conscientiousness, agreeableness, and tolerance for ambiguity are more prone to select novel concepts. In addition, the results revealed that the teams who generate creative ideas did not necessarily select creative ideas during concept selection. These results add to our understanding of team-based decision making during concept selection and allow us to provide guidelines for increasing the flow of creative ideas through this process.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1037/a0014629
发表时间：
2009-02
期刊：
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
影响因子：
--
作者：
R. Reiter‐Palmon;E. J. Robinson
通讯作者：
R. Reiter‐Palmon;E. J. Robinson
不确定的心态：面对未知的个体差异
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
R. Sorrentino;C. Roney
通讯作者：
C. Roney
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
P. Kleiman
通讯作者：
P. Kleiman
工程设计的社会维度：Mudd Design Workshop III 的观察
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
C. Dym;J. Wesner;L. Winner
通讯作者：
L. Winner
DOI：
10.1007/978-1-4615-5089-1_4
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
Organizations & Markets eJournal
影响因子：
--
作者：
E. Weber
通讯作者：
E. Weber