A systematic review of components of community-based organisation engagement.
A systematic review of components of community-based organisation engagement.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/hsc.12533
复制
发表时间：
2018-07
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Williams JR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Adebayo OW;Salerno JP;Francillon V;Williams JR
以社区为基础的组织(CBO)对于消除全球健康差距和将研究结果转化为干预措施非常重要。参与是社区卫生组织和社区卫生研究人员之间伙伴关系的组成部分，并影响任何预期成果的质量和数量。尽管以社区为基础的组织参与(CBOE)的好处得到了公认，但在其可操作性和对其在社区科学伙伴关系中的使用的理解上存在差异。为了进一步了解CBOE，本研究的目的是综合已发表的与CBOE的定义和应用相关的文献，并确定其关键组成部分。2017年3月进行了系统搜索，并于2017年6月进行了更新。关键字各不相同，以考虑到拼写和单词用法的国际差异。五个主要的数据库，MEDLINE，PubMed，CINAHL，SqucINFO和Google Scholar被用来确定潜在的研究研究。本综述共纳入32项研究。在对文献进行分析之后，出现了四个突出的主题，作为CBOE的组成部分：(1)需要(伙伴关系各方就某一具体项目的重要性及其对目标社区的拟议惠益达成共识)；(2)伙伴关系动态(CBO与科学/学术利益攸关方之间关系的运作)；(3)资源(包括但不限于：人员、资金、工作空间、专门知识和设备)；(4)成果(伙伴关系的产品)。这一综述为今后将CBOE应用于转化性研究和干预提供了基础。这一分析将帮助社区卫生研究人员规划与社区卫生组织的伙伴关系，并进行必要的调整，以改善研究结果。在伙伴关系中适当应用CBOE的组成部分将有助于研究人员解决健康差距问题。
Community-based organisations (CBOs) are important for eliminating health disparities globally and translating research findings to inform interventions. Engagement is an integral part of partnerships between CBOs and community health researchers and impacts the quality and quantity of any desired outcome. Despite the acknowledged benefits of community-based organisation engagement (CBOE), there are variations in its operationalisation and paucity in the understanding of its use in community-scientific partnerships. To further understand CBOE, the aim of this study was to synthesise published literature relevant to the definitions and applications of CBOE and identify its key components. A systematic search was conducted in March 2017, and updated in June 2017. Keywords were varied to account for international differences in spelling and word usage. Five major databases, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Google Scholar, were used to identify potential research studies. A total of 32 studies were included in this review. Following the analysis of the literature, four salient themes emerged as components of CBOE: (1) Need (a consensus between all the parties in a partnership on the importance of a specified project and its proposed benefits to a target community); (2) Partnership Dynamics (the workings of a relationship between a CBO and a scientific/academic stakeholder); (3) Resources (include but are not limited to: personnel, money, work space, expertise and equipment); and (4) Outcomes (products of the partnership). This review provides a foundation for future research in applying CBOE to translational research and interventions. This analysis will assist community health researchers in planning partnerships with CBOs, and make necessary adjustments to improve study outcomes. Appropriate application of the components of CBOE in partnerships will assist researchers in addressing health disparities.
登录
查看更多内容
同龄人之间的伙伴关系：从社区组织学术研究培训计划的发展中学到的经验教训。
DOI：
10.1353/cpr.2016.0052
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action
影响因子：
--
作者：
Jewett-Tennant J;Collins C;Matloub J;Patrick A;Chupp M;Werner JJ;Borawski EA
通讯作者：
Borawski EA
DOI：
10.1353/cpr.2015.0031
发表时间：
2015-06-01
影响因子：
1.1
作者：
Caldwell, Wilma Brakefield;Reyes, Angela G.;Israel, Barbara A.
通讯作者：
Israel, Barbara A.
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Glik, Deborah C.;Eisenman, David P.;Martel, Andrea
通讯作者：
Martel, Andrea
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Houston, HR;Harada, N;Makinodan, T
通讯作者：
Makinodan, T
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
Akintobi, Tabia Henry;Yancey, Ellen M.;Berry, Jamillah
通讯作者：
Berry, Jamillah