Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques.
Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/nmeth.2365
复制
发表时间:
2013-03
期刊:
影响因子:
48
通讯作者:
Scheuermann RH
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Aghaeepour N;Finak G;FlowCAP Consortium;DREAM Consortium;Hoos H;Mosmann TR;Brinkman R;Gottardo R;Scheuermann RH
In this analysis, the authors directly compared the performance of flow cytometry data processing algorithms to manual gating approaches. The results offer information of practical utility about the performance of the algorithms as applied to different data sets and challenges. The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nmeth.2365) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Traditional methods for flow cytometry (FCM) data processing rely on subjective manual gating. Recently, several groups have developed computational methods for identifying cell populations in multidimensional FCM data. The Flow Cytometry: Critical Assessment of Population Identification Methods (FlowCAP) challenges were established to compare the performance of these methods on two tasks: (i) mammalian cell population identification, to determine whether automated algorithms can reproduce expert manual gating and (ii) sample classification, to determine whether analysis pipelines can identify characteristics that correlate with external variables (such as clinical outcome). This analysis presents the results of the first FlowCAP challenges. Several methods performed well as compared to manual gating or external variables using statistical performance measures, which suggests that automated methods have reached a sufficient level of maturity and accuracy for reliable use in FCM data analysis. The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nmeth.2365) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Aghaeepour, Nima;Jalali, Adrin;Brinkman, Ryan R.
通讯作者:
Brinkman, Ryan R.
DOI:
10.1126/science.1198704
发表时间:
2011-05-06
期刊:
Science (New York, N.Y.)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Bendall SC;Simonds EF;Qiu P;Amir el-AD;Krutzik PO;Finck R;Bruggner RV;Melamed R;Trejo A;Ornatsky OI;Balderas RS;Plevritis SK;Sachs K;Pe'er D;Tanner SD;Nolan GP
通讯作者:
Nolan GP
影响因子:
--
作者:
Finak G;Bashashati A;Brinkman R;Gottardo R
通讯作者:
Gottardo R
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Aghaeepour, Nima;Nikolic, Radina;Hoos, Holger H.;Brinkman, Ryan R.
通讯作者:
Brinkman, Ryan R.
影响因子:
16.8
作者:
Bendall SC;Nolan GP;Roederer M;Chattopadhyay PK
通讯作者:
Chattopadhyay PK