Feasibility of using the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA-24) dietary assessment tool in older adults.
Feasibility of using the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA-24) dietary assessment tool in older adults.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/20552076231212802
复制
发表时间：
2023-01
期刊：
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Batsis, John A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Spangler, Hillary B.;Driesse, Tiffany;Fowler, Michael;Lynch, David H.;Liang, Xiaohui;Gross, Danae;Petersen, Curtis;Batsis, John A.
饮食模式可以影响健康老龄化的轨迹。然而，饮食评估工具的使用可能具有挑战性。随着技术在老年人中的使用越来越多，我们旨在评估老年人完成在线自动自助24小时（阿萨-24）饮食评估工具的可行性。我们对20名社区老年人（≥65岁）进行了一项随机、两阶段、两序列、交叉设计，比较他们单独完成ASA-24与研究助理（RA）完成ASA-24的偏好。参与者通过ResearchMatch.com招募，并以1：1的比例随机分配到单独完成阿萨-24或与RA一起完成的序列中，间隔一周。每次会议结束后，参与者完成了一个在线的11项可行性调查（李克特量表范围为1-5，非常不同意到非常同意）。报告每个问题的平均值和标准差。平均年龄为69 ± 3.5岁（90%为女性），未观察到性别、年龄、人种、种族、教育或收入差异。两组均不需要RA援助（p = 0.34）。然而，两组都认为在RA的帮助下系统更容易随访（RA：4.4 ± 1.3，vs. SA 4.6 ± 0.5，p = 0.65），特别是当他们首先单独完成阿萨-24时（p = 0.04）。当单独进行阿萨-24时，系统可快速学习的置信度较低（SA 4.5 ± 0.5→3.4 ± 1.0 vs RA 3.4 ± 1.0→3.4 ± 0.7，p = 0.001）。阿萨-24被认为是不那么麻烦后，反复暴露在那些结束与RA。虽然老年人能够独立完成阿萨-24，但使用RA可以提高信心。在更多的参与者中提高样本的多样性可以提供有用的数据，以提高膳食评估的科学性。
Dietary patterns can impact the trajectories of healthy aging. However, dietary assessment tools can be challenging to use. With the increased use of technology in older adults, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of older adults completing the online, Automated Self-Administered 24-h (ASA-24) dietary assessment tool. We conducted a randomized, two-period, two-sequence, crossover design of twenty community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years) comparing their preference for completing the ASA-24 alone versus with a research assistant (RA). Participants were recruited via ResearchMatch.com and randomly allocated 1:1 to a sequence of completing both an ASA-24 alone or with an RA, separated by one week. After each session, participants completed an online 11-item feasibility survey (Likert-scale range of 1–5, strongly disagree to strongly agree). Mean and standard deviations were reported for each question. Mean age was 69 ± 3.5 years (90% females), with no differences were observed for sex, age, race, ethnicity, education, or income. Neither group felt a need for RA assistance (p = 0.34). However, both groups felt the system was easier to follow with the help of an RA (RA: 4.4 ± 1.3, vs. SA 4.6 ± 0.5, p = 0.65), particularly when they completed the ASA-24 alone, first (p = 0.04). When conducting the ASA-24 alone, there was less confidence the system could be learned quickly (SA 4.5 ± 0.5→3.4 ± 1.0 vs RA 3.4 ± 1.0→3.4 ± 0.7, p = 0.001). The ASA-24 was thought to be less cumbersome after repeated exposure in those concluding with the RA. While older adults were able to complete the ASA-24 independently, the use of an RA led to improved confidence. Enhancing the sample diversity in a larger number of participants could provide helpful data to improve the science of dietary assessment.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Gregoric, Matej;Kotnik, Katja Zdesar;Blenkus, Mojca Gabrijelcic
通讯作者：
Blenkus, Mojca Gabrijelcic
影响因子：
5.8
作者：
Chen, X.;Liu, Z.;Brodaty, Henry
通讯作者：
Brodaty, Henry
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
Subar AF;Potischman N;Dodd KW;Thompson FE;Baer DJ;Schoeller DA;Midthune D;Kipnis V;Kirkpatrick SI;Mittl B;Zimmerman TP;Douglass D;Bowles HR;Park Y
通讯作者：
Park Y
影响因子：
13.8
作者：
English LK;Ard JD;Bailey RL;Bates M;Bazzano LA;Boushey CJ;Brown C;Butera G;Callahan EH;de Jesus J;Mattes RD;Mayer-Davis EJ;Novotny R;Obbagy JE;Rahavi EB;Sabate J;Snetselaar LG;Stoody EE;Van Horn LV;Venkatramanan S;Heymsfield SB
通讯作者：
Heymsfield SB
DOI：
10.1186/s13195-022-00957-1
发表时间：
2022-01-12
期刊：
Alzheimer's research & therapy
影响因子：
--
作者：
de Crom TOE;Mooldijk SS;Ikram MK;Ikram MA;Voortman T
通讯作者：
Voortman T