Analytic consistency and neural correlates of peak alpha frequency in the study of pain.
Analytic consistency and neural correlates of peak alpha frequency in the study of pain.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109460
复制
发表时间:
2022-02-15
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Kutch, Jason J.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
McLain, Natalie J.;Yani, Moheb S.;Kutch, Jason J.
Several studies have found evidence of reduced resting-state peak alpha frequency (PAF) in populations with pain. However, the stability of PAF from different analytic pipelines used to study pain has not been determined and underlying neural correlates of PAF have not been validated in humans. For the first time we compare analytic pipelines and the relationship of PAF to activity in the whole brain and thalamus, a hypothesized generator of PAF. We collected resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data and subsequently 64 channel resting-state electroencephalographic (EEG) from 47 healthy men, controls from an ongoing study of chronic prostatitis (a pain condition affecting men). We identified important variations in EEG processing for PAF from a review of 17 papers investigating the relationship between pain and PAF. We tested three progressively complex pre-processing pipelines and varied four post-processing variables (epoch length, alpha band, calculation method, and region-of-interest [ROI]) that were inconsistent across the literature. We found a single principal component, well-represented by the average PAF across all electrodes (grand-average PAF), explained > 95% of the variance across participants. We also found the grand-average PAF was highly correlated among the pre-processing pipelines and primarily impacted by calculation method and ROI. Across methods, interindividual differences in PAF were correlated with rs-fMRI-estimated activity in the thalamus, insula, cingulate, and sensory cortices. These results suggest PAF is a relatively stable marker with respect to common pre and post-processing methods used in pain research and reflects interindividual differences in thalamic and salience network function.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Broetzner, Christina P.;Klimesch, Wolfgang;Kerschbaum, Hubert H.
通讯作者:
Kerschbaum, Hubert H.
DOI:
10.1016/0013-4694(80)90011-5
发表时间:
1980-01-01
期刊:
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
影响因子:
--
作者:
DASILVA, FHL;VOS, JE;VANROTTERDAM, A
通讯作者:
VANROTTERDAM, A
影响因子:
7.4
作者:
Dinh, Son Ta;Nickel, Moritz M.;Ploner, Markus
通讯作者:
Ploner, Markus
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Furman, Andrew J.;Prokhorenko, Mariya;Seminowicz, David A.
通讯作者:
Seminowicz, David A.
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Grandy, Thomas H.;Werkle-Bergner, Markus;Lindenberger, Ulman
通讯作者:
Lindenberger, Ulman