Best research practices for using the Implicit Association Test.
Best research practices for using the Implicit Association Test.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/s13428-021-01624-3
复制
发表时间：
2022-06
影响因子：
5.4
通讯作者：
Wiers, Reinout W.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Greenwald, Anthony G.;Brendl, Miguel;Cai, Huajian;Cvencek, Dario;Dovidio, John F.;Friese, Malte;Hahn, Adam;Hehman, Eric;Hofmann, Wilhelm;Hughes, Sean;Hussey, Ian;Jordan, Christian;Kirby, Teri A.;Lai, Calvin K.;Lang, Jonas W. B.;Lindgren, Kristen P.;Maison, Dominika;Ostafin, Brian D.;Rae, James R.;Ratliff, Kate A.;Spruyt, Adriaan;Wiers, Reinout W.
关键词：
对内隐态度和定型观念（内隐偏见）可能导致的无意歧视的兴趣激发了许多研究调查。大部分研究都使用内隐联想测验（IAT）来测量被认为是内隐偏见基础的联想强度。自上次发表关于使用内部审计测试措施进行研究的建议最佳做法的处理以来，已经过去了十多年。在第一作者的初稿和随后的三个草稿之后，22位作者和14位评论者为完善有价值的研究实践的选择和描述做出了广泛的贡献。36位作者和评论者中有29位提供了同意或不同意的个人判断。在本文中提出的21种建议的使用IAT措施进行研究的做法中，除了两种之外，所有的做法都得到了90%或更多的人的认可，他们认为自己有足够的知识来表达同意或不同意;只有4%的判断表示不同意。对于两种做法，尽管有两个以上的判决意见分歧（四为一，五为其他），保留这些分歧的基础上提出的建议。文章还提供了如何报告的程序IAT措施的实证文章的建议。
Interest in unintended discrimination that can result from implicit attitudes and stereotypes (implicit biases) has stimulated many research investigations. Much of this research has used the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to measure association strengths that are presumed to underlie implicit biases. It had been more than a decade since the last published treatment of recommended best practices for research using IAT measures. After an initial draft by the first author, and continuing through three subsequent drafts, the 22 authors and 14 commenters contributed extensively to refining the selection and description of recommendation-worthy research practices. Individual judgments of agreement or disagreement were provided by 29 of the 36 authors and commenters. Of the 21 recommended practices for conducting research with IAT measures presented in this article, all but two were endorsed by 90% or more of those who felt knowledgeable enough to express agreement or disagreement; only 4% of the totality of judgments expressed disagreement. For two practices that were retained despite more than two judgments of disagreement (four for one, five for the other), the bases for those disagreements are described in presenting the recommendations. The article additionally provides recommendations for how to report procedures of IAT measures in empirical articles.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Greenwald, AG;Nosek, BA;Banaji, MR
通讯作者：
Banaji, MR
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Greenwald, AG;McGhee, DE;Schwartz, JLK
通讯作者：
Schwartz, JLK
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Dasgupta, N;McGhee, DE;Banaji, MR
通讯作者：
Banaji, MR
影响因子：
9.9
作者：
Blanton, Hart;Jaccard, James;Tetlock, Philip E.
通讯作者：
Tetlock, Philip E.
影响因子：
16.4
作者：
Greenwald, Anthony G.;Banaji, Mahzarin R.
通讯作者：
Banaji, Mahzarin R.