Cheaper Medicines for the Better Off? A Comparison of Medicine Prices and Client Socioeconomic Status Between Chain and Independent Retail Pharmacies in Urban India.
Cheaper Medicines for the Better Off? A Comparison of Medicine Prices and Client Socioeconomic Status Between Chain and Independent Retail Pharmacies in Urban India.
复制标题
DOI:
10.34172/ijhpm.2020.214
复制
发表时间:
2022-05-01
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Goodman, Catherine
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Miller, Rosalind;Goodman, Catherine
Background: The growth of chain pharmacies in India, and other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), is challenging the status quo of pharmacy retail markets which have historically been dominated by independent pharmacies. This raises the question of whether such organisations will have a positive impact on affordability and access to medicines. Methods: This paper draws on a standardised patient (SP) survey to measure the prices of medicines and expenditure on consultations for two tracer conditions (suspected tuberculosis [TB] in an adult and diarrhoea in an absent child) at a random sample of 230 chain and independent pharmacies in Bengaluru. Asset data were collected from 808 exit interviews with pharmacy customers to determine socioeconomic profiles of clients. Results: Chain pharmacies were found to provide lower priced medicines for patients seeking care for diarrhoea and TB, with expenditure also lower for diarrhoea patients, compared to independent pharmacies. This was seemingly driven by lower prices rather than number of medicines dispensed or prescribing habits. Despite the availability of cheaper medicines, chains served wealthier clients, compared to independent pharmacies. Conclusion: The findings indicate the potential for chains to contribute to improving medicine affordability as they expand. However, any attempt to leverage this organisational model for public health good would need to take account of the current client-mix of these pharmacies and be accompanied by appropriate regulatory constraints in order to realise the potential benefits for poorer groups.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
8.1
作者:
Dasari M;David SD;Miller E;Puyana JC;Roy N
通讯作者:
Roy N
影响因子:
1.8
作者:
Kumar, Santosh;Urala, Arun Srinivas;Valiathan, Ashima
通讯作者:
Valiathan, Ashima
影响因子:
39.2
作者:
Luo, Jing;Kulldorff, Martin;Kesselheim, Aaron S.
通讯作者:
Kesselheim, Aaron S.
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1003160108
发表时间:
2012-07-31
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Reardon, Thomas;Timmer, C. Peter;Minten, Bart
通讯作者:
Minten, Bart
DOI:
10.18549/pharmpract.2019.3.1518
发表时间:
2019-09-01
期刊:
Pharmacy Practice (Granada)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Athiyah, Umi;Setiawan, Catur D;Hermansyah, Andi
通讯作者:
Hermansyah, Andi