Does Explaining Social Behavior Require Multiple Memory Systems?
Does Explaining Social Behavior Require Multiple Memory Systems?
复制标题
解释社会行为需要多个记忆系统吗？
DOI：
10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.001
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
19.9
通讯作者：
De Houwer, Jan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Van Dessel, Pieter;Gawronski, Bertram;De Houwer, Jan
阿莫迪奥认为，几十年来，社会认知研究一直依赖于不精确的双过程模型，这些模型建立在人们如何学习和表示信息的可疑假设之上。他提出了一个替代框架，用于将社会行为解释为多个可分离记忆系统的产物，其基础是认知神经科学已经揭示了不同形式的学习和记忆背后存在独立系统的证据。尽管我们赞赏阿莫迪奥在社会认知、学习心理学和神经科学之间建立桥梁的尝试，但我们相信他的交互式记忆系统模型的基础并不稳固。我们认为，最重要的限制是行为分离为具有功能不同学习机制的多个记忆系统提供了强有力的证据。这个想法的一个主要问题是，行为分离可能是在存储信息的检索和使用过程中产生的，这不需要对不同的记忆系统或不同的学习形式做出任何假设。
Amodio argues that social cognition research has for many decades relied on imprecise dual-process models that build on questionable assumptions about how people learn and represent information. He presents an alternative framework for explaining social behavior as the product of multiple dissociable memory systems, based on the idea that cognitive neuroscience has revealed evidence for the existence of separate systems underlying distinct forms of learning and memory. Although we applaud Amodio’s attempt to build bridges between social cognition, learning psychology, and neuroscience, we believe that his interactive memory systems model rests on shaky grounds. In our view, the most significant limitation is the idea that behavioral dissociations provide strong evidence for multiple memory systems with functionally distinct learning mechanisms. A major problem with this idea is that behavioral dissociations can arise from processes during the retrieval and use of stored information, which does not require any assumptions about distinct memory systems or distinct forms of learning.
社会认知 2.0：交互式记忆系统帐户
影响因子：
19.9
作者：
D. Amodio
通讯作者：
D. Amodio
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Graybiel, Ann M.;Grafton, Scott T.
通讯作者：
Grafton, Scott T.
影响因子：
4
作者：
Hu, Xiaoqing;Gawronski, Bertram;Balas, Robert
通讯作者：
Balas, Robert