Methods Evaluation for Rapid Concentration and Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in Raw Wastewater Using Droplet Digital and Quantitative RT-PCR.

Methods Evaluation for Rapid Concentration and Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in Raw Wastewater Using Droplet Digital and Quantitative RT-PCR.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s12560-021-09488-8
复制
发表时间:
2021-09
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Aw TG
Aw TG
中科院分区:
农林科学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Flood MT;D'Souza N;Rose JB;Aw TG

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的废水监测是一种新兴的公共卫生工具,用于了解2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)在社区中的传播。需要评估不同病毒浓缩方法和PCR方法的性能,以确定其是否适用于检测废水中的SARS-CoV-2。我们评估了超滤和聚乙二醇(PEG)沉淀方法,以浓缩污水处理厂和污水网络上游(例如,人孔、升降机站)。使用Phi6噬菌体作为包膜病毒的替代物,通过不同浓度方法测定病毒的回收率。此外,使用逆转录定量PCR(RT-qPCR)和逆转录液滴数字PCR(RT-ddPCR)确定所有废水样品中SARS-CoV-2的存在,靶向三个遗传标记(N1,N2和E)。使用加标样品,使用基于超滤的方法估计Phi6回收率为2.6 - 11.6%,使用PEG沉淀法估计为22.2 - 51.5%。在PEG程序中,有和没有16小时过夜孵育之间的回收效率没有显著差异(p <0.05),证明了获得当天结果的可行性。RT-ddPCR检测SARS-CoV-2遗传标记的灵敏度和精密度均高于RT-qPCR。虽然所有三个SARS-CoV-2的遗传标记,使用RT-ddPCR检测,E基因的水平几乎低于检测限使用RT-qPCR。总的来说,我们的研究表明PEG沉淀是一种有效的低成本方法,可以在SARS-CoV-2的常规废水监测中同时处理大量样品。RT-ddPCR可用于不同废水基质中SARS-CoV-2遗传标记的绝对定量。在线版本包含补充材料,可通过10.1007/s12560 - 021 - 09488 - 8获取。
Wastewater surveillance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an emerging public health tool to understand the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in communities. The performance of different virus concentration methods and PCR methods needs to be evaluated to ascertain their suitability for use in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater. We evaluated ultrafiltration and polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation methods to concentrate SARS-CoV-2 from sewage in wastewater treatment plants and upstream in the wastewater network (e.g., manholes, lift stations). Recovery of viruses by different concentration methods was determined using Phi6 bacteriophage as a surrogate for enveloped viruses. Additionally, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in all wastewater samples was determined using reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and reverse transcription droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR), targeting three genetic markers (N1, N2 and E). Using spiked samples, the Phi6 recoveries were estimated at 2.6–11.6% using ultrafiltration-based methods and 22.2–51.5% using PEG precipitation. There was no significant difference in recovery efficiencies (p < 0.05) between the PEG procedure with and without a 16 h overnight incubation, demonstrating the feasibility of obtaining same day results. The SARS-CoV-2 genetic markers were more often detected by RT-ddPCR than RT-qPCR with higher sensitivity and precision. While all three SARS-CoV-2 genetic markers were detected using RT-ddPCR, the levels of E gene were almost below the limit of detection using RT-qPCR. Collectively, our study suggested PEG precipitation is an effective low-cost procedure which allows a large number of samples to be processed simultaneously in a routine wastewater monitoring for SARS-CoV-2. RT-ddPCR can be implemented for the absolute quantification of SARS-CoV-2 genetic markers in different wastewater matrices. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12560-021-09488-8.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04701.x
发表时间: 2010-08-01
影响因子: 4
作者:
Aw, T. G.;Gin, K. Y-H.
通讯作者: Gin, K. Y-H.
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143101
发表时间: 2021-03-25
期刊: The Science of the total environment
影响因子: --
作者:
Cuevas-Ferrando E;Pérez-Cataluña A;Allende A;Guix S;Randazzo W;Sánchez G
通讯作者: Sánchez G
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139960
发表时间: 2020-10-15
影响因子: 9.8
作者:
Ahmed, Warish;Bertsch, Paul M.;Kitajima, Masaaki
通讯作者: Kitajima, Masaaki
DOI: 10.1007/s12560-019-09378-0
发表时间: 2019-06-01
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Blanco, Albert;Abid, Islem;Bosch, Albert
通讯作者: Bosch, Albert
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2010.501351
发表时间: 2010-01-01
影响因子: 5.2
作者:
Gendron, Louis;Verreault, Daniel;Duchaine, Caroline
通讯作者: Duchaine, Caroline