The Governance of Social Risks: Nurturing Social Solidarity through Social Impact Bonds?
The Governance of Social Risks: Nurturing Social Solidarity through Social Impact Bonds?
复制标题
社会风险治理：通过社会影响力债券培育社会团结？
DOI：
10.1080/13563467.2021.1899151
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Guter-Sandu A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Guter-Sandu A
尽管已经存在了十年，但社会影响债券(SIB)--通过为社会项目提供资金的结果合同支付--仍是一种利基工具。它们只占整体影响力投资领域的一小部分，预计将以更快的速度增长，并预示着追求社会政策目标的新模式。虽然这还没有发生，但他们仍然受益于很大程度的政治支持和学术兴趣。但除了以从业者为重点的文献外，研究SIB的学术机构在很大程度上认为，金融化和社会团结的削弱是支撑这一发展的主要动力。本文认为，将SIB视为在社会政策目标的设计和追求中发生的变革的表达，这一点也很重要。通过将SIB视为一种社会风险治理形式，文章认为SIB培育了自己的社会团结形式。基于SIB的三个不同原则，强调了三种类型的团结：跨期、跨部门和风险保险团结。虽然这些可以刺激社会包容、创新和合作，但文章讨论了它们如何也可能是虚假的，并可能被撤销。
Despite having been around for a decade now, Social Impact Bonds (SIBs) – payment by result contracts funding social programmes – are still a niche instrument. Constituting but a fraction of the overall impact investment sector, they were expected to grow much faster and augur a new model of pursuing social policy objectives. Whilst this has not yet occurred, they nevertheless continue to benefit from a great degree of political support and academic interest. But outside of the practitioner-focused literature, the scholarship investigating SIBs has largely identified financialisation and the erosion of social solidarity as the main dynamics underpinning this development. This article argues that it is important to also attend to SIBs as expressions of transformations occurring within the design and pursuit of social policy objectives. By looking at SIBs as a form of governance of social risks, the article argues that SIBs nurture their own forms of social solidarity. Based on three distinguishing tenets of SIBs, three types of solidarities are emphasised: inter-temporal, cross-sectoral and risk-insurance solidarities. Whilst these can spur social inclusion, innovation and collaboration, the article discusses how they can also be spurious and can come undone.
登录
查看更多内容
不平等%20和%20%201%
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
J. Essletzbichler
通讯作者：
J. Essletzbichler
论通过市场解决集体关切的困难：从市场手段到问责手段
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
D. Neyland;V. Ehrenstein;Sveta Milyaeva
通讯作者：
Sveta Milyaeva
审计协会的微观基础建模：组织和审计追踪的逻辑
影响因子：
16.4
作者：
M. Power
通讯作者：
M. Power
社区参与中的治理和治理：权力、责任和风险的流沙
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
S. Rolfe
通讯作者：
S. Rolfe
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
Cooper, Christine;Graham, Cameron;Himick, Darlene
通讯作者：
Himick, Darlene