The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types.
The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1187/cbe.15-12-0260
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Zhao J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brancaccio-Taras L;Pape-Lindstrom P;Peteroy-Kelly M;Aguirre K;Awong-Taylor J;Balser T;Cahill MJ;Frey RF;Jack T;Kelrick M;Marley K;Miller KG;Osgood M;Romano S;Uzman JA;Zhao J
本文介绍了PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics 1.0版的开发和验证，这是一种用于衡量部门变化的可靠工具。结果发现，文科院校在实施《愿景与变革》的建议方面沿着，总体而言，文科院校在课程标准方面得分最高，在评估标准方面得分最低。PULSE愿景与变革规则1.0版评估生命科学部门在实施愿景与变革报告原则方面的进展。本文报告的发展，他们的验证，并在衡量部门的变化与愿景和变化的建议保持一致的可靠性的规则。这些规则评估了五个领域的66个不同标准：课程调整，评估，教师实践/教师支持，基础设施和气候变化。从这项工作的结果表明，可以用来评估部门转型公平跨机构类型，并代表基线数据的愿景和变化的建议，通过生命科学计划在美国各地。虽然所有类型的院校都取得了进展，但文科院校在实施这些建议方面走得沿着。一般来说，机构在课程调整规则上得分最高，在评估规则上得分最低。这项研究的结果清楚地表明，愿景与变革规则1.0版是有效和公平的，可以跟踪生命科学部门转型的长期进展。此外，五个标题中的四个具有广泛的适用性，可用于评估其他科学、技术、工程和数学学科的部门转型。
This paper describes the development and validation of the PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, version 1.0, a reliable tool for measuring departmental change. It was found that liberal arts institutions are farther along in implementing the recommendations of Vision and Change and that institutions overall earned the highest scores on the Curriculum rubric and the lowest scores on the Assessment rubric. The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, version 1.0, assess life sciences departments’ progress toward implementation of the principles of the Vision and Change report. This paper reports on the development of the rubrics, their validation, and their reliability in measuring departmental change aligned with the Vision and Change recommendations. The rubrics assess 66 different criteria across five areas: Curriculum Alignment, Assessment, Faculty Practice/Faculty Support, Infrastructure, and Climate for Change. The results from this work demonstrate the rubrics can be used to evaluate departmental transformation equitably across institution types and represent baseline data about the adoption of the Vision and Change recommendations by life sciences programs across the United States. While all institution types have made progress, liberal arts institutions are farther along in implementing these recommendations. Generally, institutions earned the highest scores on the Curriculum Alignment rubric and the lowest scores on the Assessment rubric. The results of this study clearly indicate that the Vision & Change Rubrics, version 1.0, are valid and equitable and can track long-term progress of the transformation of life sciences departments. In addition, four of the five rubrics have broad applicability and can be used to evaluate departmental transformation by other science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1187/cbe.06-09-0189
发表时间：
2006-01-01
期刊：
CBE life sciences education
影响因子：
--
作者：
Bush, S D;Pelaez, N J;Tanner, K D
通讯作者：
Tanner, K D
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Borrego, Maura;Henderson, Charles
通讯作者：
Henderson, Charles
DOI：
10.1187/cbe.14-06-0099
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
CBE life sciences education
影响因子：
--
作者：
Bangera G;Brownell SE
通讯作者：
Brownell SE
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Couch, Brian A.;Wood, William B.;Knight, Jennifer K.
通讯作者：
Knight, Jennifer K.
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Brownell, Sara E.;Tanner, Kimberly D.
通讯作者：
Tanner, Kimberly D.