Comprehensive analysis of diverse biochemical treatment technologies of fixed-bed coal gasification wastewater from the perspective of different weight dimensions

Comprehensive analysis of diverse biochemical treatment technologies of fixed-bed coal gasification wastewater from the perspective of different weight dimensions
复制标题

从不同重量维度综合分析固定床煤气化废水多种生化处理技术

DOI:
10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117889
复制
发表时间:
2021-02
影响因子:
8.6
通讯作者:
Cui Peizhe
Cui Peizhe
中科院分区:
工程技术1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yang Jingwei;Hou Zhengkun;Chen Zhengrun;Ma Zhaoyuan;Li Shuhua;Wang Yinglong;Gao Jun;Cui Peizhe

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

由于煤化工废水生化处理工艺的不同,对煤化工废水处理工艺的综合性能进行评价是一项复杂而重要的工作。建立了固定床煤气化废水生化深度处理工艺的3E三角模型,并对该工艺进行了评价。在3E三角模型中,考虑了19个关键性能指标。在工程性能方面,上流式厌氧污泥床反应器表现出最好的性能。在生命周期环境影响方面,序批式反应器的表现最好,通过生命周期评估,特别是淡水水生生态毒性潜力和全球变暖潜力。通常,由于其他技术的固定成本和功耗较高,因此升流式厌氧污泥床反应器的折旧和可变成本较低。总体而言,上流式厌氧污泥床反应器案例在3E综合性能方面表现优异。另外,膜生物反应器具有较好的发展前景,其重量对COD去除率的影响最大。
Assessing the comprehensive performance of coal chemical wastewater process is an intricate and important task due to different biochemical treatment technologies. In this work, a 3E triangle model is developed to evaluate biochemical and advanced treatment technologies for zero liquid discharge of fix-bed coal gasification wastewater treatment process. In 3E triangle model, 19 key performance indicators are considered. In engineering performance aspect, up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor case shows the best performance. In the life cycle environmental impact aspect, sequence batch reactor case shows the best performance through life cycle assessment, especially freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity potential and global warming potential. Generally, due to the higher fixed cost and power consumption of other technologies, the depreciation and variable cost of up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor case are lower. Overall, the up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor case shows excellent performance in 3E comprehensive performance. In addition, membrane bioreactor has better development prospects and its weight has a greatest impact which COD removal accounts for the majority.
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.108
发表时间: 2019
期刊: Chemosphere
影响因子: 8.8
作者:
Su Xiaoling;Chiang Penchi;Pan Shuyuan;Chen Guangjiao;Tao Yinren;Wu Gaojie;Wang Feifei;Cao Wenzhi
通讯作者: Cao Wenzhi
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03737
发表时间: 2018-01
影响因子: 8.4
作者:
Peizhe Cui;Y. Qian;Siyu Yang
通讯作者: Peizhe Cui;Y. Qian;Siyu Yang
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2007.497
发表时间: 2007-08
期刊: Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research
影响因子: --
作者:
A. P. Machado;L. Urbano;A. Brito;P. Janknecht;J. Salas;R. Nogueira
通讯作者: A. P. Machado;L. Urbano;A. Brito;P. Janknecht;J. Salas;R. Nogueira
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2015.09.010
发表时间: 2015-12
影响因子: 4.4
作者:
Jianyu Sun;K. Xiao;X. Yan;P. Liang;Yue-xiao Shen;Ningwei Zhu;Xia Huang
通讯作者: Jianyu Sun;K. Xiao;X. Yan;P. Liang;Yue-xiao Shen;Ningwei Zhu;Xia Huang
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.103
发表时间: 2016-05
期刊: Applied Energy
影响因子: 11.2
作者:
S. Pan;A. Lafuente;P. Chiang
通讯作者: S. Pan;A. Lafuente;P. Chiang