The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Primary Emotional Systems and Emotional Regulation.
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Primary Emotional Systems and Emotional Regulation.
复制标题
COVID-19大流行对主要情绪系统和情绪调节的影响。
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph18115742
复制
发表时间：
2021-05-27
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Di Trani M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mariani R;Renzi A;Di Monte C;Petrovska E;Di Trani M
(1)背景：冠状病毒病2019(新冠肺炎)大流行作为一种严重的全球性危机，影响身心健康，构成了独特的挑战。这项工作的主要目的是研究创伤事件的影响，同时观察人类的适应能力。最早研究情感系统进化谱系的适应性重要性的理论之一被称为大脑思维(PankSepp，2010)。本研究旨在探讨初级情绪系统(PES)和情绪调节(ER)策略在封锁前后是否存在差异；以及大流行前积极系统和特定情绪调节是否对身心健康起到保护或风险因素的作用。(2)方法：对98名在大流行前已参加过相关研究的受试者，在大流行爆发后重新填写情感神经科学人格量表(ANPS)和情绪调节问卷(ERQ)，并增加症状自评量表(SCL-90R)。(3)结果：新冠肺炎封锁规则对情绪调节和PES的再平衡有影响。此外，大流行前的表达抑制ERQ策略和ANPS悲伤评分似乎是相关的风险因素，这预示着在封锁期间全球严重程度指数(GSI)得分更高。(4)结论：禁闭似乎激活了游戏和关怀作为保护系统，但已经失去了积极重新解释情况的能力。
(1) Background: The COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a unique challenge as a severe global crisis affecting physical and psychological health. The main purpose of this work is to study the impact of a traumatic event while also observing the human ability to adapt. One of the first theories to study the adaptive importance of the evolutionary lineage of the affective systems is referred to as BrainMind (Panksepp, 2010). This study aims to explore whether primary emotional systems (PES) and emotion regulation (ER) strategies show differences between the pre- and post- lockdown period; and if positive systems and specific emotion regulation pre-pandemic act as a protective or risk factor for mental and physical wellbeing. (2) Methods: 98 participants who had participated in a previous study before the pandemic were re-contacted to refill the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scale (ANPS) and the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) after the outbreak of the pandemic with the addition of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90R). (3) Results: The results showed that the COVID-19 lockdown rules had an impact on Emotional Regulation and on a re-balancing of PES. Moreover, pre-pandemic expressive–suppressive ERQ strategies and ANPS SADNESS scores appeared as relevant risk factors, which predicted higher Global Severity Index (GSI) scores during lockdown. (4) Conclusions: The lockdown appears to have activated PLAY and CARE as protective systems, but has detuned the ability to positively reinterpret the situation.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
11.3
作者：
Cao, Wenjun;Fang, Ziwei;Zheng, Jianzhong
通讯作者：
Zheng, Jianzhong
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph18042103
发表时间：
2021-02-21
影响因子：
--
作者：
Gutiérrez-Hernández ME;Fanjul LF;Díaz-Megolla A;Reyes-Hurtado P;Herrera-Rodríguez JF;Enjuto-Castellanos MDP;Peñate W
通讯作者：
Peñate W
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph17186642
发表时间：
2020-09-11
影响因子：
--
作者：
Jiménez Ó;Sánchez-Sánchez LC;García-Montes JM
通讯作者：
García-Montes JM
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Jenkins, JM;Oatley, K
通讯作者：
Oatley, K
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Demertzis, Nicolas;Eyerman, Ron
通讯作者：
Eyerman, Ron