Relationship Between Community-Level Distress and Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation, Facility Access, and Clinical Outcomes After Inpatient Coronary Revascularization.
Relationship Between Community-Level Distress and Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation, Facility Access, and Clinical Outcomes After Inpatient Coronary Revascularization.
复制标题
社区层面的痛苦与心脏康复参与、设施使用以及住院冠状动脉血运重建后临床结果之间的关系。
DOI:
10.1161/circoutcomes.123.010148
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Likosky,DonaldS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Thompson,MichaelP;Hou,Hechuan;Stewart2nd,JamesW;Pagani,FrancisD;Hawkins,RobertB;Keteyian,StevenJ;Sukul,Devraj;Likosky,DonaldS
BACKGROUNDAlthough disparities in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) participation are well documented, the role of community-level distress is poorly understood. This study evaluated the relationship between community-level distress and CR participation, access to CR facilities, and clinical outcomes.METHODSA retrospective cohort study was conducted on a 100% sample of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing inpatient coronary revascularization between July 2016 and December 2018. Community-level distress was defined using the Distressed Community Index quintile at the beneficiary zip code level, with the first and fifth quintiles representing prosperous and distressed communities, respectively. Outpatient claims were used to identify any CR use within 1 year of discharge. Beneficiary and CR facility zip codes were used to describe access to CR facilities. Adjusted logistic regression models evaluated the association between Distressed Community Index quintiles, CR use, and clinical outcomes, including one-year mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and acute myocardial infarction hospitalization.RESULTSA total of 414 730 beneficiaries were identified, with 96 929 (23.4%) located in the first and 67 900 (16.4%) in the fifth quintiles, respectively. Any CR use was lower for beneficiaries in distressed compared with prosperous communities (26.0% versus 46.1%,P<0.001), which was significant after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.40–0.42]). A total of 98 458 (23.7%) beneficiaries had a CR facility within their zip code, which increased from 16.3% in prosperous communities to 26.6% in distressed communities. Any CR use was associated with absolute reductions in mortality (−6.8% [95% CI, −7.0% to −6.7%]), all-cause hospitalization (−5.9% [95% CI, −6.3% to −5.6%]), and acute myocardial infarction hospitalization (−1.3% [95% CI, −1.5% to −1.1%]), which were similar across each Distressed Community Index quintiles.CONCLUSIONSAlthough community-level distress was associated with lower CR participation, the clinical benefits were universally received. Addressing barriers to CR in distressed communities should be considered a significant priority to improve survival after coronary revascularization and reduce disparities.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1985
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
G. Fredriksson;H. Kindahl;L. Edqvist
通讯作者:
L. Edqvist
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
M. Abel;D. Baird
通讯作者:
D. Baird
DOI:
10.1530/jrf.0.0670215
发表时间:
1983
期刊:
Journal of reproduction and fertility
影响因子:
--
作者:
A. Flint;E. Sheldrick
通讯作者:
E. Sheldrick
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1985
期刊:
Journal of Reproduction and Fertility
影响因子:
--
作者:
A. Flint;E. Sheldrick
通讯作者:
E. Sheldrick
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1971
期刊:
Recent Progress in Hormone Research
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Mccracken;D. Baird;J. R. Goding
通讯作者:
J. R. Goding