Do Theories of Implicit Race Bias Change Moral Judgments?
Do Theories of Implicit Race Bias Change Moral Judgments?
复制标题
隐性种族偏见理论会改变道德判断吗？
DOI：
10.1007/s11211-010-0118-z
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
J. Knobe
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Daryl Cameron;bullet B Keith;Payne bullet;J. Knobe;C. D. Cameron;B. Payne;J. Knobe
最近的社会心理学研究表明，人们怀有“隐性种族偏见”，这种偏见可能是无意识的或无法控制的。由于意识和控制传统上被认为是道德责任归属的必要条件，内隐偏见提出了一个独特的挑战：我们是原谅基于内隐偏见的歧视，因为它的无意识性质，还是我们惩罚歧视，不管它是如何产生的？本实验调查了这些理论对种族歧视道德判断的影响。结果表明，不同的理论对道德判断的影响不同：当内隐偏见被定义为无意识时，人们认为有偏见的行为人的道德责任比这些偏见被定义为自动（即难以控制）或没有提供内隐偏见理论时要少。
Recent research in social psychology suggests that people harbor “implicit race biases,” biases which can be unconscious or uncontrollable. Because awareness and control have traditionally been deemed necessary for the ascription of moral responsibility, implicit biases present a unique challenge: do we pardon discrimination based on implicit biases because of its unintentional nature, or do we punish discrimination regardless of how it comes about? The present experiments investigated the impact such theories have upon moral judgments about racial discrimination. The results show that different theories differ in their impact on moral judgments: when implicit biases are defined as unconscious, people hold the biased agent less morally responsible than when these biases are defined as automatic (i.e., difficult to control), or when no theory of implicit bias is provided.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
FAZIO, RH;JACKSON, JR;WILLIAMS, CJ
通讯作者：
WILLIAMS, CJ
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
J. Haidt
通讯作者：
J. Haidt