Reflections on a key component of co-producing climate services: Defining climate metrics from user needs
Reflections on a key component of co-producing climate services: Defining climate metrics from user needs
复制标题
对共同生产气候服务关键组成部分的思考：根据用户需求定义气候指标
DOI：
10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100204
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Vincent K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Vincent K
人们越来越认识到共同生产气候服务对于弥合当前气候信息决策“可用性”差距的重要性，但对于如何实现这一目标的准确理解还没有得到很好的阐述。联合生产过程的一个关键阶段涉及具体确定哪些气候指标可以有效地为决策提供信息，但可以用来构建这一信息的方法常常被忽视。我们讨论了四种现有社会科学方法（访谈角色扮演研讨会、开放式访谈、优先调查和强化调查）的选择和应用如何源于共同生产的不同认识论方法特征，并反过来嵌入其中，以确定马拉维和坦桑尼亚水和农业部门的决策相关气候指标。在此过程中，我们反思了我们对共同生产的理解的演变，因为我们的假设受到了挑战，从我们能够从用户那里“获取”指标的期望，到基于对决策环境的更好理解的动态相互定义。这些反思为气候服务共同生产的新兴经验提供了信息，并对气候变化空间之外更广泛的背景产生了影响，在气候变化空间中，共同生产试图改善科学与社会的互动。
There is increasing recognition of the importance of co-producing climate services to bridge the current “usability” gap in climate information for decision-making – yet understanding precisely how this should take place is less well elaborated. One key stage of the co-production process involves identifying specifically which climate metrics can usefully inform decisions – but methods that can be drawn upon to construct this information are often overlooked. We discuss how the choice and application of four existing social science methods (interview-informed role play workshop, open-ended interviews, prioritised surveys and enhanced surveys) arose out of, and was in turn embedded within, a different epistemological approach characteristic of co-production to identify decision-relevant climate metrics for the water and agriculture sectors in Malawi and Tanzania. In so doing, we reflect on the evolution of our understanding of co-production as our assumptions were challenged, from the expectation that we would be able to “obtain” metrics from users, to a dynamic mutual definition based on better understanding of the decision-making contexts. Such reflections inform emerging experiences of co-production of climate services, as well as having implications for broader contexts beyond the climate change space in which co-production is attempted to improve science-society interactions.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3
作者：
Blane Harvey;Logan Cochrane;M. Epp
通讯作者：
M. Epp
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
K. Vincent;Meaghan Daly;C. Scannell;Bill Leathes
通讯作者：
K. Vincent;Meaghan Daly;C. Scannell;Bill Leathes
协同生产能力：重新思考多元化世界中的科学与治理关系
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
L. Kerkhoff;L. Lebel
通讯作者：
L. Lebel
共同探索气候风险研讨会：非洲城市的经验
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
A. Steynor;J. Padgham;C. Jack;B. Hewitson;C. Lennard
通讯作者：
C. Lennard
确实%20有效%20（对于%2015%%20of%20the%20men）：%20Lessons%20in%20understanding%20and%20addressing%20user%20needs%20in%20climate%20services%20from%20Mali
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Edward R. Carr;S. Onzere
通讯作者：
S. Onzere