‘The Green New Deal’ as partisan cue: Evidence from a survey experiment in the rural U.S.

‘The Green New Deal’ as partisan cue: Evidence from a survey experiment in the rural U.S.
复制标题

“绿色新政”作为党派线索:来自美国农村地区调查实验的证据

DOI:
10.1080/09644016.2022.2090655
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
5.5
通讯作者:
McConnell, Kathryn
McConnell, Kathryn
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
McConnell, Kathryn

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

最近的研究表明,通过将环境政策与社会和经济项目捆绑在一起,可以增加公众对气候行动的支持--绿色新政是这一战略最广为人知的迭代之一。然而,政党暗示理论表明,公众对该政策的支持将取决于该提案的强大民主党协会。在对美国西部1,203名农村居民进行的一项预先登记的调查实验中,我发现了强有力的证据,表明“绿色新政”这一短语起到了党派暗示的作用,使农村居民对捆绑气候政策的支持率下降了9.1个百分点。即使在调查问题中加入了针对特定地区气候影响的框架,这种抑制效应也是强劲的。
Recent research suggests that public support for climate action can be increased by bundling environmental policy with social and economic programs – the Green New Deal being one of the most widely known iterations of this strategy. Yet, party cue theory suggests that public support for the policy will be shaped by the strong Democratic associations of the proposal. In a preregistered survey experiment conducted among 1,203 residents of the rural western United States, I find strong evidence that the phrase ‘the Green New Deal’ functions as a partisan cue, lowering support for a bundled climate policy among rural residents by 9.1 percentage points. This depressive effect is robust even when framing around region-specific climate impacts is added to the survey question.
道德框架和气候变化政策态度
DOI: --
发表时间: 2015
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Alexander W. Severson;E. Coleman
通讯作者: E. Coleman
DOI: --
发表时间: 2021
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Mary C. McGrath
通讯作者: Mary C. McGrath
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab81c1
发表时间: 2020-05-01
影响因子: 6.7
作者:
Bergquist, Parrish;Mildenberger, Matto;Stokes, Leah C.
通讯作者: Stokes, Leah C.
个性化的风险信息可以减少气候问题
DOI: --
发表时间: 2019
期刊: Global Environmental Change
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Mildenberger;M. Lubell;M. Hummel
通讯作者: M. Hummel
DOI: 10.1017/s0007123420000113
发表时间: 2021-10-01
影响因子: 5
作者:
Merkley, Eric;Stecula, Dominik A.
通讯作者: Stecula, Dominik A.