Prognostic Value of Histologic Subtype and Treatment Modality for T1a Kidney Cancers.
Prognostic Value of Histologic Subtype and Treatment Modality for T1a Kidney Cancers.
复制标题
DOI:
10.3233/kca-190072
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Bjurlin MA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Siev M;Renson A;Tan HJ;Rose TL;Kang SK;Huang WC;Bjurlin MA
To evaluate overall survival (OS) of T1a kidney cancers stratified by histologic subtype and curative treatment including partial nephrectomy (PN), percutaneous ablation (PA), and radical nephrectomy (RN). We queried the National Cancer Data Base (2004–2015) for patients with T1a kidney cancers who were treated surgically. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves based on histologic subtype and management. Cox proportional regression models were used to determine whether histologic subtypes and management procedure predicted OS. 46,014 T1a kidney cancers met inclusion criteria. Kaplan Meier curves demonstrated differences in OS by treatment for clear cell, papillary, chromophobe, and cystic histologic subtypes (all p < 0.001), but no differences for sarcomatoid (p = 0.110) or collecting duct (p = 0.392) were observed. Adjusted Cox regression showed worse OS for PA than PN among patients with clear cell (HR 1.58, 95%CI [1.44–1.73], papillary RCC (1.53 [1.34–1.75]), and chromophobe RCC (2.19 [1.64–2.91]). OS was worse for RN than PN for clear cell (HR 1.38 [1.28–1.50]) papillary (1.34 [1.16–1.56]) and chromophobe RCC (1.92 [1.43–2.58]). Predictive models using Cox proportional hazards incorporating histology and surgical procedure alone were limited (c-index 0.63) while adding demographics demonstrated fair predictive power for OS (c-index 0.73). In patients with pathologic T1a RCC, patterns of OS differed by surgery and histologic subtype. Patients receiving PN appears to have better prognosis than both PA and RN. However, the incorporation of histologic subtype and treatment modality into a risk stratification model to predict OS had limited utility compared with variables representing competing risks.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
23.4
作者:
Moch, Holger;Cubilla, Antonio L.;Ulbright, Thomas M.
通讯作者:
Ulbright, Thomas M.
影响因子:
45.3
作者:
Kutikov, Alexander;Egleston, Brian L.;Uzzo, Robert G.
通讯作者:
Uzzo, Robert G.
影响因子:
6.6
作者:
Méjean, A;Hopirtean, V;Dufour, B
通讯作者:
Dufour, B
影响因子:
6.6
作者:
Campbell, Steven;Uzzo, Robert G.;Pierorazio, Philip M.
通讯作者:
Pierorazio, Philip M.
影响因子:
39.2
作者:
Talenfeld AD;Gennarelli RL;Elkin EB;Atoria CL;Durack JC;Huang WC;Kwan SW
通讯作者:
Kwan SW