Histogram Analysis of Diffusion Kurtosis Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosis of Hepatic Fibrosis.
Histogram Analysis of Diffusion Kurtosis Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosis of Hepatic Fibrosis.
复制标题
弥散峰度磁共振成像诊断肝纤维化的直方图分析
DOI:
10.3348/kjr.2018.19.5.916
复制
发表时间:
2018-09
影响因子:
4.8
通讯作者:
Zeng MS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sheng RF;Jin KP;Yang L;Wang HQ;Liu H;Ji Y;Fu CX;Zeng MS
Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) histogram analysis in hepatic fibrosis staging. Materials and Methods Thirty-six rats were divided into carbon tetrachloride-induced fibrosis groups (6 rats per group for 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks) and a control group (n = 12). MRI was performed using a 3T scanner. Histograms of DKI were obtained for corrected apparent diffusion (D), kurtosis (K) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Mean, median, skewness, kurtosis and 25th and 75th percentiles were generated and compared according to the fibrosis stage and inflammatory activity. Results A total of 35 rats were included, and 12, 5, 5, 6, and 7 rats were diagnosed as F0–F4. The mean, median, 25th and 75th percentiles, kurtosis of D map, median, 25th percentile, skewness of K map, and 75th percentile of ADC map demonstrated significant correlation with fibrosis stage (r = −0.767 to 0.339, p < 0.001 to p = 0.039). The fibrosis score was the independent variable associated with histogram parameters compared with inflammatory activity grade (p < 0.001 to p = 0.041), except the median of K map (p = 0.185). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of D were larger than K and ADC maps in fibrosis staging, although no significant differences existed in pairwise comparisons (p = 0.0512 to p = 0.847). Conclusion Corrected apparent diffusion of DKI histogram analysis provides added value and better diagnostic performance to detect various liver fibrosis stages compared with ADC.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
1.6
作者:
Huang YQ;Liang HY;Yang ZX;Ding Y;Zeng MS;Rao SX
通讯作者:
Rao SX
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Ahn SJ;Lee JM;Chang W;Lee SM;Kang HJ;Yang H;Yoon JH;Park SJ;Han JK
通讯作者:
Han JK
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Kim H;Park SH;Kim EK;Kim MJ;Park YN;Park HJ;Choi JY
通讯作者:
Choi JY
影响因子:
5.9
作者:
Lambregts DM;Beets GL;Maas M;Curvo-Semedo L;Kessels AG;Thywissen T;Beets-Tan RG
通讯作者:
Beets-Tan RG
影响因子:
13.5
作者:
Bedossa, P;Poynard, T
通讯作者:
Poynard, T