The neural mechanism of aesthetic judgments of dynamic landscapes: an fMRI study.

The neural mechanism of aesthetic judgments of dynamic landscapes: an fMRI study.
复制标题

动态景观审美判断的神经机制:fMRI研究。

DOI:
10.1038/s41598-020-77658-y
复制
发表时间:
2020-11-27
期刊:
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
He X
He X
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhao X;Wang J;Li J;Luo G;Li T;Chatterjee A;Zhang W;He X

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

以往的神经美学研究大多局限于对静态刺激的审美判断,对动态刺激审美判断的研究较少。本研究探讨了动态景观审美的神经机制,并比较了动态景观与静态景观审美的神经机制。参与者在对动态景观和匹配的静态景观进行审美判断时进行扫描。结果表明,在动态景观和静态景观的审美判断中,枕叶、额叶、辅助运动区、扣带皮层和脑岛等区域普遍被激活。此外,与静态景观相比,动态景观的审美判断中颞叶中回(MT/V5)和海马的激活更强。本研究提供的神经学证据表明,在观看动态景观时,视觉处理相关区域、情绪相关区域比静态景观更活跃,这也表明动态刺激比静态刺激更美丽。
Most previous neuroaesthetics research has been limited to considering the aesthetic judgment of static stimuli, with few studies examining the aesthetic judgment of dynamic stimuli. The present study explored the neural mechanisms underlying aesthetic judgment of dynamic landscapes, and compared the neural mechanisms between the aesthetic judgments of dynamic landscapes and static ones. Participants were scanned while they performed aesthetic judgments on dynamic landscapes and matched static ones. The results revealed regions of occipital lobe, frontal lobe, supplementary motor area, cingulate cortex and insula were commonly activated both in the aesthetic judgments of dynamic and static landscapes. Furthermore, compared to static landscapes, stronger activations of middle temporal gyrus (MT/V5), and hippocampus were found in the aesthetic judgments of dynamic landscapes. This study provided neural evidence that visual processing related regions, emotion-related regions were more active when viewing dynamic landscapes than static ones, which also indicated that dynamic stimuli were more beautiful than static ones.
DOI: 10.1038/33402
发表时间: 1998-04-09
期刊: NATURE
影响因子: 64.8
作者:
Epstein, R;Kanwisher, N
通讯作者: Kanwisher, N
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.07.005
发表时间: 2008-09-01
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Fairhall, Scott L.;Ishai, Alumit
通讯作者: Ishai, Alumit
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.10.003
发表时间: 2013-01-01
期刊: BRAIN AND LANGUAGE
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Bohrn, Isabel C.;Altmann, Ulrike;Jacobs, Arthur M.
通讯作者: Jacobs, Arthur M.
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00102
发表时间: 2011
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Cross ES;Kirsch L;Ticini LF;Schütz-Bosbach S
通讯作者: Schütz-Bosbach S
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00235
发表时间: 2012
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Cazzato V;Siega S;Urgesi C
通讯作者: Urgesi C