OsCESA9 conserved-site mutation leads to largely enhanced plant lodging resistance and biomass enzymatic saccharification by reducing cellulose DP and crystallinity in rice.
OsCESA9 conserved-site mutation leads to largely enhanced plant lodging resistance and biomass enzymatic saccharification by reducing cellulose DP and crystallinity in rice.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/pbi.12700
复制
发表时间:
2017-09
影响因子:
13.8
通讯作者:
Peng L
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Li F;Xie G;Huang J;Zhang R;Li Y;Zhang M;Wang Y;Li A;Li X;Xia T;Qu C;Hu F;Ragauskas AJ;Peng L
Genetic modification of plant cell walls has been posed to reduce lignocellulose recalcitrance for enhancing biomass saccharification. Since cellulose synthase (CESA) gene was first identified, several dozen CESA mutants have been reported, but almost all mutants exhibit the defective phenotypes in plant growth and development. In this study, the rice (Oryza sativa) Osfc16 mutant with substitutions (W481C, P482S) at P‐CR conserved site in CESA9 shows a slightly affected plant growth and higher biomass yield by 25%–41% compared with wild type (Nipponbare, a japonica variety). Chemical and ultrastructural analyses indicate that Osfc16 has a significantly reduced cellulose crystallinity (CrI) and thinner secondary cell walls compared with wild type. CESA co‐IP detection, together with implementations of a proteasome inhibitor (MG132) and two distinct cellulose inhibitors (Calcofluor, CGA), shows that CESA9 mutation could affect integrity of CESA4/7/9 complexes, which may lead to rapid CESA proteasome degradation for low‐DP cellulose biosynthesis. These may reduce cellulose CrI, which improves plant lodging resistance, a major and integrated agronomic trait on plant growth and grain production, and enhances biomass enzymatic saccharification by up to 2.3‐fold and ethanol productivity by 34%–42%. This study has for the first time reported a direct modification for the low‐DP cellulose production that has broad applications in biomass industries.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
Peng, LC;Kawagoe, Y;Delmer, D
通讯作者:
Delmer, D
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1202079109
发表时间:
2012-10-16
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Chiniquy, Dawn;Sharma, Vaishali;Ronald, Pamela C.
通讯作者:
Ronald, Pamela C.
影响因子:
11.4
作者:
Li, Ming;Si, Shengli;Peng, Liangcai
通讯作者:
Peng, Liangcai
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1200352109
发表时间:
2012-03-13
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Harris, Darby M.;Corbin, Kendall;DeBolt, Seth
通讯作者:
DeBolt, Seth
影响因子:
2
作者:
CROOK, MJ;ENNOS, AR
通讯作者:
ENNOS, AR