Partners' Relationship Mindfulness Promotes Better Daily Relationship Behaviours for Insecurely Attached Individuals.

Partners' Relationship Mindfulness Promotes Better Daily Relationship Behaviours for Insecurely Attached Individuals.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3390/ijerph17197267
复制
发表时间:
2020-10-05
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Stanton SCE
Stanton SCE
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gazder T;Stanton SCE

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

依恋焦虑和回避通常与有害的关系过程有关,包括更多的消极和更少的积极关系行为。然而,最近的理论和经验证据表明,积极因素可以缓冲不安全的依恋。我们假设,关系正念(RM)-开放或接受注意和意识到在当前关系中内部和外部发生的事情-可能会促进焦虑和回避个体更好的日常行为,因为正念可以提高自动反应,情绪调节和同理心的意识。在一项二元日常经验研究中,我们发现,虽然一个人自己的日常RM并没有缓冲他们自己的不安全依恋对同一天的关系行为的影响,他们的合作伙伴的日常RM,特别是依恋回避。另一方面,我们对第二天关系行为的研究结果表明,对于回避型个体和焦虑伴侣的人来说,较低(与较高)的前一天RM与第二天较高的积极伴侣行为相关,这表明这可能是试图“弥补”前一天。这些发现支持了依恋安全增强模型,并对随着时间的推移检查不同形式的正念和正念训练有影响。
Attachment anxiety and avoidance are generally associated with detrimental relationship processes, including more negative and fewer positive relationship behaviours. However, recent theoretical and empirical evidence has shown that positive factors can buffer insecure attachment. We hypothesised that relationship mindfulness (RM)—open or receptive attention to and awareness of what is taking place internally and externally in a current relationship—may promote better day-to-day behaviour for both anxious and avoidant individuals, as mindfulness improves awareness of automatic responses, emotion regulation, and empathy. In a dyadic daily experience study, we found that, while an individual’s own daily RM did not buffer the effects of their own insecure attachment on same-day relationship behaviours, their partner’s daily RM did, particularly for attachment avoidance. Our findings for next-day relationship behaviours, on the other hand, showed that lower (vs. higher) prior-day RM was associated with higher positive partner behaviours on the following day for avoidant individuals and those with anxious partners, showing this may be an attempt to “make up” for the previous day. These findings support the Attachment Security Enhancement Model and have implications for examining different forms of mindfulness over time and for mindfulness training.
DOI: 10.1177/1088868315615450
发表时间: 2017-02-01
影响因子: 10.8
作者:
Karremansi, Johan C.;Schellekens, Melanie P. J.;Kappen, Gesa
通讯作者: Kappen, Gesa
DOI: 10.1177/1948550619888884
发表时间: 2020-02-12
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Dobson, Kiersten;Zhu, Jenney;Campbell, Lorne
通讯作者: Campbell, Lorne
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.080
发表时间: 2016-07-01
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
Davis, Tanya Jane;Morris, Mary;Drake, Mark Moriarty
通讯作者: Drake, Mark Moriarty
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.808
发表时间: 1989-11-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
BOLGER, N;DELONGIS, A;SCHILLING, EA
通讯作者: SCHILLING, EA
DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000338
发表时间: 2021-09-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Girme, Yuthika U.;Peters, Brett J.;Sigal, Matthew J.
通讯作者: Sigal, Matthew J.