Quantitative data collection approaches in subject-reported oral health research: a scoping review.
Quantitative data collection approaches in subject-reported oral health research: a scoping review.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s12903-022-02399-5
复制
发表时间：
2022-10-03
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Liu, Honghu
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Maida, Carl A.;Xiong, Di;Marcus, Marvin;Zhou, Linyu;Huang, Yilan;Lyu, Yuetong;Shen, Jie;Osuna-Garcia, Antonia;Liu, Honghu
关键词：
本范围审查报告的研究，收集调查数据，使用定量研究来衡量自我报告的口腔健康状况的结果措施。本综述的目的是对一般人群调查中用于评估自我报告的口腔健康状况和口腔健康生活质量的措施进行分类。该综述以系统性综述和荟萃分析范围综述扩展的首选报告项目（PRISMA-ScR）为指导，检索了4个在线书目数据库。标准包括（1）同行评议的文章，（2）2011年至2021年期间发表的论文，（3）仅使用定量方法的研究，以及（4）包含自我评估的口腔健康状况和/或口腔健康相关生活质量的结果指标。对所有调查数据收集方法进行了评估，并确定了采用较新技术方法的论文。在2981篇无重复的论文中，有239篇符合资格标准。一半的论文使用影响评分，如OHIP-14; 10%使用功能性指标，如GOHAI，26%使用两种或两种以上的指标，而8%使用口腔健康状况的评级量表。审查确定了四种数据收集方法：面对面、邮寄、基于互联网和电话调查。大多数（86%）采用面对面调查，39%在亚太和中东国家进行，8%在北美进行。66%的研究直接从进行调查的诊所和学校招募参与者。前三位的抽样方法是方便抽样（52%）、简单随机抽样（12%）和分层抽样（12%）。在四种数据收集方法中，面对面调查的答复率最高（91%），而基于互联网的调查的答复率最低（37%）。与其他数据收集方法相比，电话调查覆盖的人口更广。有两种值得注意的方法：1）样本选择，研究人员使用不同的平台访问受试者，2）与受试者的互动模式，使用计算机收集自我报告的数据。这项研究提供了一个口腔健康结果的措施，包括受试者报告的口腔健康状况的评估，并注意到最近在对一般人群进行的调查中使用的新兴计算机技术方法。这些较新的应用程序，虽然很少使用，但对研究人员和使用或需要口腔保健的各种人群都有希望。在线版本包含补充材料，可通过10.1186/s12903-022-02399-5获得。
This scoping review reports on studies that collect survey data using quantitative research to measure self-reported oral health status outcome measures. The objective of this review is to categorize measures used to evaluate self-reported oral health status and oral health quality of life used in surveys of general populations. The review is guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) with the search on four online bibliographic databases. The criteria include (1) peer-reviewed articles, (2) papers published between 2011 and 2021, (3) only studies using quantitative methods, and (4) containing outcome measures of self-assessed oral health status, and/or oral health-related quality of life. All survey data collection methods are assessed and papers whose methods employ newer technological approaches are also identified. Of the 2981 unduplicated papers, 239 meet the eligibility criteria. Half of the papers use impact scores such as the OHIP-14; 10% use functional measures, such as the GOHAI, and 26% use two or more measures while 8% use rating scales of oral health status. The review identifies four data collection methods: in-person, mail-in, Internet-based, and telephone surveys. Most (86%) employ in-person surveys, and 39% are conducted in Asia-Pacific and Middle East countries with 8% in North America. Sixty-six percent of the studies recruit participants directly from clinics and schools, where the surveys were carried out. The top three sampling methods are convenience sampling (52%), simple random sampling (12%), and stratified sampling (12%). Among the four data collection methods, in-person surveys have the highest response rate (91%), while the lowest response rate occurs in Internet-based surveys (37%). Telephone surveys are used to cover a wider population compared to other data collection methods. There are two noteworthy approaches: 1) sample selection where researchers employ different platforms to access subjects, and 2) mode of interaction with subjects, with the use of computers to collect self-reported data. The study provides an assessment of oral health outcome measures, including subject-reported oral health status and notes newly emerging computer technological approaches recently used in surveys conducted on general populations. These newer applications, though rarely used, hold promise for both researchers and the various populations that use or need oral health care. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02399-5.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
Grando, Liliane;Mello, Ana;Steffenello-Durigon, Giovanna
通讯作者：
Steffenello-Durigon, Giovanna
影响因子：
1.6
作者：
Burnham, Martin J.;Le, Yen K.;Piedmont, Ralph L.
通讯作者：
Piedmont, Ralph L.
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Coelho, Mania de Quadros;Cordeiro, Jairo Matozinhos;Ferreira, Raquel Conceicao
通讯作者：
Ferreira, Raquel Conceicao
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph15081732
发表时间：
2018-08-01
影响因子：
--
作者：
Hanisch, Marcel;Wiemann, Sabrina;Jung, Susanne
通讯作者：
Jung, Susanne
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Wang Y;Hays R;Marcus M;Maida C;Shen J;Xiong D;Lee S;Spolsky V;Coulter I;Crall J;Liu H
通讯作者：
Liu H