Characterizing Online Vandalism: A Rational Choice Perspective

Characterizing Online Vandalism: A Rational Choice Perspective
复制标题

网络破坏行为的特征:理性选择的视角

DOI:
10.1145/3400806.3400813
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
International Conference on Social Media and Society
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Champion, Kaylea
Champion, Kaylea
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Champion, Kaylea

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

哪些因素会影响破坏行为的决定?虽然危害是显而易见的,但对破坏者的好处却不那么清楚。在许多情况下,被破坏的东西本身可能是破坏者使用或喜欢的东西。破坏行为具有传播价值:可能是对破坏者自己,对破坏行为所针对的某些观众,以及对一般公众。将破坏者视为理性的社区参与者,尽管他们的反规范行为提供了以新颖的方式参与或对抗他们的选择的可能性。理性选择理论(RCT)应用于价值预期理论(VET),提供了一种在理性选择框架内描述行为的策略,并以假设个人偏好和约束的权重为前提,个人通过破坏行为最大化自己的效用。本研究应用随机对照试验和职业教育试验的框架,深入了解破坏者的偏好和限制。使用维基百科的混合方法分析,我结合联合收割机社会计算和犯罪学的角度对破坏行为提出了一个本体论的破坏在线内容社区。我用这个本体分类141例破坏,并发现破坏行为的性质不同的破坏者的相对可识别性,政策历史与维基百科,以及所需的努力破坏。
What factors influence the decision to vandalize? Although the harm is clear, the benefit to the vandal is less clear. In many cases, the thing being damaged may itself be something the vandal uses or enjoys. Vandalism holds communicative value: perhaps to the vandal themselves, to some audience at whom the vandalism is aimed, and to the general public. Viewing vandals as rational community participants despite their antinormative behavior offers the possibility of engaging with or countering their choices in novel ways. Rational choice theory (RCT) as applied in value expectancy theory (VET) offers a strategy for characterizing behaviors in a framework of rational choices, and begins with the supposition that subject to some weighting of personal preferences and constraints, individuals maximize their own utility by committing acts of vandalism. This study applies the framework of RCT and VET to gain insight into vandals’ preferences and constraints. Using a mixed-methods analysis of Wikipedia, I combine social computing and criminological perspectives on vandalism to propose an ontology of vandalism for online content communities. I use this ontology to categorize 141 instances of vandalism and find that the character of vandalistic acts varies by vandals’ relative identifiability, policy history with Wikipedia, and the effort required to vandalize.
DOI: 10.1145/3233391.3233544
发表时间: 2018
期刊: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Open Collaboration
影响因子: --
作者:
Jonathan T. Morgan;Aaron L Halfaker
通讯作者: Aaron L Halfaker
引文过滤:伊朗对维基百科的审查
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Nima Nazeri;Collin Anderson
通讯作者: Collin Anderson
维基百科破坏行为研究:文献综述
DOI: --
发表时间: 2016
期刊: Spanish Conference on Information Retrieval
影响因子: --
作者:
Jesús Tramullas;Piedad Garrido Picazo;Ana
通讯作者: Ana
ORES:促进维基百科社会技术问题的修复
DOI: --
发表时间: 2018
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Aaron L Halfaker;R. Geiger
通讯作者: R. Geiger
威慑犯罪分子:盗窃和暴力的理性选择模型
DOI: --
发表时间: 2006
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Matsueda;D. Kreager;D. Huizinga
通讯作者: D. Huizinga