Pharmacological cognitive enhancement: Examining the ethical principles guiding college students' abstention.
Pharmacological cognitive enhancement: Examining the ethical principles guiding college students' abstention.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s12152-018-9389-0
复制
发表时间：
2019-10
期刊：
影响因子：
1.4
通讯作者：
Lam C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bavarian N;Sumstine S;Mendez J;Yomogida K;Figueroa W;Lam C
了解大学生拒绝药物认知增强（PCE）的伦理原则，并确定与支持不同原则相关的因素。采用一阶段整群抽样方法对美国某大学的本科生进行问卷调查。采用主题分析法探讨了指导PCE行为的伦理原则。多变量逻辑回归分析被用来研究与认可的伦理原则相关的社会人口统计学相关性。在499名完成调查的合资格学生中（学生回应比例：94.7%），259名学生对个人教育持否定态度，没有参与个人教育，并提供了不参与的原因。通过专题分析，确定了八个专题，答复者往往在每份答复中赞同一个以上的专题。最受认可的三个主题是不渎职（即，避免PCE以防止伤害），不赞成药物（即，对物质使用的道德反对）和剂量有益性（即，坚持剂量指导以促进健康）。社会人口学相关性与赞同每个主题不同的主题。学生放弃PCE有多种原因，其中许多是由道德原则指导的。这些调查结果可纳入今后的预防方案拟订信息。
To understand the ethical principles guiding college students’ abstention from pharmacological cognitive enhancement (PCE), and to determine the correlates associated with endorsing different principles. One-stage cluster sampling was used to implement a paper-based survey among undergraduate students attending one university in the U.S. Thematic analysis was used to explore the ethical principles guiding PCE abstention. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to examine sociodemographic correlates associated with endorsed ethical principles. Of the 499 eligible students who completed the survey (student response proportion: 94.7%), 259 students had a negative attitude towards PCE, did not engage in PCE, and provided reasons for abstention. The thematic analysis resulted in the identification of eight themes, with respondents often endorsing more than one theme per response. The three themes most endorsed were non-malfeasance (i.e., avoiding PCE to prevent harm), disapproval of drugs (i.e., a moral opposition to substance use) and dosage beneficence (i.e., adhering to dosage guidance to promote health). The sociodemographic correlates associated with endorsing each theme varied across themes. Students abstain from PCE for a multitude of reasons, many of which are guided by ethical principles. These findings may be incorporated into future prevention programming messages.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
Forlini, Cynthia;Racine, Eric
通讯作者：
Racine, Eric
迈向英国大学药理认知增强的道德生态。
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
Vagwala MK;Bicquelet A;Didziokaite G;Coomber R;Corrigan O;Singh I
通讯作者：
Singh I
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
Forlini, Cynthia;Schildmann, Jan;Vollmann, Jochen
通讯作者：
Vollmann, Jochen
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
Bell, Stephanie;Partridge, Brad;Hall, Wayne
通讯作者：
Hall, Wayne
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Cakic, V.
通讯作者：
Cakic, V.