Tradition (re-)defined: Farm v factory trade-offs in the definition of geographical indications, the case of Three Counties Cider
Tradition (re-)defined: Farm v factory trade-offs in the definition of geographical indications, the case of Three Counties Cider
复制标题
传统（重新）定义：地理标志定义中农场与工厂的权衡，以三县苹果酒为例
DOI：
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.03.005
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
5.1
通讯作者：
Oledinma A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Oledinma A
英国是最大的苹果酒国际市场。大约11%的英国市场是由“手工”或传统苹果酒占据的，这些苹果酒由小规模的“农场”和大规模的“工厂”生产商生产。根据世界生产框架，我们研究了农场和工厂生产者对1996年授予三县苹果酒的地理标志（GI）的对比观点。对生产商的采访突出了两个群体在执法不力和英国消费者对原产地地理标志缺乏了解方面的共同点。两者都被认为损害了地理标志给生产者、消费者和旅游业带来的好处。然而，对于地理标志在保护传统生产价值和手工生产者方面的价值，农场生产者和工厂生产者之间出现了不同的看法。这具体涉及到地理标志的允许程度，即允许更常与大规模生产相关的非传统生产方法。虽然与手工苹果酒的工厂生产一致，但农场生产者认为，在保护食品遗产和手工生产方面，允许非传统生产方法降低了地理标志的价值。我们的分析强调了在地理标志等法律文书中对遗产食品进行编纂所隐含的紧张关系，以及正式遗产化过程的挑战。我们的研究结果也为英国的受保护食品名称计划提供了经验教训，该计划将在英国脱欧后实施，并突出了那些开发地理标志的人在支持手工生产和保护传统产品的工厂生产之间的紧张关系，后者可能更具经济意义。
The UK is the largest international market for cider. Around 11 per cent of the UK market is accounted for by ‘craft’ or traditional ciders made by both small scale ‘farm’ and large-scale ‘factory’ producers. Drawing on the worlds of production framework we examine the contrasting perspectives of farm and factory producers on the geographical indication (GI) awarded to Three Counties Cider in 1996. Interviews with producers highlight commonalities of view across both groups around weak enforcement and a lack of understanding among UK consumers of geographical indications of origin. Both are thought to undermine the producer, consumer and tourism benefits of the GI. Differences of view between farm and factory producers emerge, however, about the value of the GI in protecting traditional production values and artisanal producers. This relates specifically to the permissiveness of the GI in terms of allowing non-traditional production methods more commonly associated with large-scale production. While consistent with the factory production of craft cider, farm producers argue that the allowance of non-traditional production methods reduces the value of the GI in terms of protecting food heritage and artisanal production. Our analysis emphasises the tensions implicit in the codification of heritage food products in legal instruments such as GIs and the challenges of formal heritagisation processes. Our results also suggest lessons for the UK's Protected Food Names scheme which will come into operation after Brexit and highlight the tension for those developing GIs between supporting artisanal production and protecting, the potentially more economically significant, factory-based production of traditional products.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.5860/choice.35-1019
发表时间：
1997
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
R. Salais;M. Storper
通讯作者：
R. Salais;M. Storper
“酿造真相”：当代伦敦的精酿啤酒、阶级和场所
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Andrew Wallace
通讯作者：
Andrew Wallace
让消费者回归——消费者和乡村游客决定购买本地和本地化手工食品背后的动机、看法和价值观——瑞典的例子
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
P. Rytkönen;M. Bonow;C. Girard;H. Tunón
通讯作者：
H. Tunón
利益相关者对苹果酒和葡萄酒路线的集体经济构想
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
L. Cloutier;L. Renard;S. Arcand
通讯作者：
S. Arcand
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
N. M. Nor;M. Sharif;M. Zahari;Hannita Mohd. Salleh;Noriza Isha;Rosmaliza Muhammad
通讯作者：
Rosmaliza Muhammad