Improving Spanish translations of tobacco dependence measures using cognitive interviewing.
Improving Spanish translations of tobacco dependence measures using cognitive interviewing.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/00952990.2021.1998514
复制
发表时间：
2022-01-02
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Correa-Fernandez, Virmarie
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Castro, Yessenia;Leija, Annette;Guerra, Zully C.;Londono, Tatiana;Heydarian, Nazanin M.;Correa-Fernandez, Virmarie
认知访谈是从优先人群中系统地收集有关调查项目的反馈的做法，其目的是识别和纠正问题，以提高调查的可理解性。关于这种预测试方法改善调查项目的程度的证据有限。当前的研究检验了结合认知访谈来改进两种烟草依赖指标的西班牙语翻译的效用。对西班牙语版本的威斯康星州吸烟依赖动机清单（68 项）和尼古丁依赖综合症量表（19 项）中的项目进行了对西班牙语吸烟者的认知访谈。有问题的项目根据参与者的反馈进行了修改，并在第二轮访谈中重新评估（N = 23，78.3% 男性；21.7% 女性）。 87 个项目中有 23 个存在理解问题，67 个项目引发了至少一项问题报告。修订前与修订后的问题数量明显减少 (t [90] = 6.55, p < .001)。与标准翻译程序相结合，对优先人群进行认知访谈似乎是确保项目内容可理解且相关的有用方法。
Cognitive interviewing is the practice of systematically collecting feedback about survey items from members of the priority population, with the goal of identifying and rectifying problems to increase the comprehensibility of the survey. Evidence is limited on the extent to which this method of pretesting improves survey items. The current study examined the utility of incorporating cognitive interviewing to improve the Spanish translations of two measures of tobacco dependence. Items from the Spanish versions of the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (68 items) and Nicotine Dependence Syndrome Scale (19 items) were subjected to cognitive interviews with Spanish-speaking smokers. Problematic items were revised based on participant feedback and re-assessed in a second round of interviews (N = 23, 78.3% male; 21.7% female). Twenty-three of the 87 items demonstrated comprehension problems, and 67 items elicited at least one problem report. Number of problems were significantly fewer pre- vs. post- revision (t [90] = 6.55, p < .001). In combination with standard translation procedures, cognitive interviewing with the priority population appears to be a useful method for ensuring comprehensible and relevant item content.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
Cropsey, Karen L.;Trent, Lindsay R.;Hendricks, Peter S.
通讯作者：
Hendricks, Peter S.
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
Parrott, Charlotte E.;Rathnayaka, Nuvan;Green, Charles
通讯作者：
Green, Charles
影响因子：
12.7
作者：
Pérez-Stable, EJ;Ramirez, A;McAlister, A
通讯作者：
McAlister, A
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Piper, Megan E.;Bolt, Daniel M.;Baker, Timothy B.
通讯作者：
Baker, Timothy B.
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Brothers, Brittany M.;Borrelli, Belinda
通讯作者：
Borrelli, Belinda