Comparative study of nanosecond electric fields in vitro and in vivo on hepatocellular carcinoma indicate macrophage infiltration contribute to tumor ablation in vivo.
Comparative study of nanosecond electric fields in vitro and in vivo on hepatocellular carcinoma indicate macrophage infiltration contribute to tumor ablation in vivo.
复制标题
体外和体内纳秒电场对肝细胞癌的比较研究表明巨噬细胞浸润有助于体内肿瘤消融
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0086421
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Zheng S
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chen X;Yin S;Hu C;Chen X;Jiang K;Ye S;Feng X;Fan S;Xie H;Zhou L;Zheng S
Background and Aim Recurrence and metastasis are associated with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma even in the patients who have undergone radical resection. Therefore, effective treatment is urgently needed for improvement of patients' survival. Previously, we reported that nanosecond pulse electric fields (nsPEFs) can ablate melanoma by induction of apoptosis and inhibition of angiogenesis. This study aims to investigate the in vivo ablation strategy by comparing the dose effect of nanosecond electric fields in vitro and in vivo on hepatocellular carcinoma. Materials and Methods Four hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines HepG2, SMMC7721, Hep1-6, and HCCLM3 were pulsed to test the anti-proliferation and anti-migration ability of 100 ns nsPEFs in vitro. The animal model of human subdermal xenograft HCCLM3 cells into BALB/c nude mouse was used to test the anti-tumor growth and macrophage infiltration in vivo. Results In vitro assays showed anti-tumor effect of nsPEFs is dose-dependant. But the in vivo study showed the strategy of low dose and multiple treatments is superior to high dose single treatment. The macrophages infiltration significantly increased in the tumors which were treated by multiple low dose nsPEFs. Conclusion The low dose multiple nsPEFs application is more efficient than high dose single treatment in inhibiting the tumor volume in vivo, which is quite different from the dose-effect relationship in vitro. Beside the electric field strength, the macrophage involvement must be considered to account for effect variability and toxicology in vivo.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.3
作者:
Nuccitelli R;Tran K;Lui K;Huynh J;Athos B;Kreis M;Nuccitelli P;De Fabo EC
通讯作者:
De Fabo EC
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Chen, X.;Zhuang, J.;Beebe, S. J.
通讯作者:
Beebe, S. J.
影响因子:
1.9
作者:
Schoenbach, KH;Beebe, SJ;Buescher, ES
通讯作者:
Buescher, ES
影响因子:
2.2
作者:
Chen X;James Swanson R;Kolb JF;Nuccitelli R;Schoenbach KH
通讯作者:
Schoenbach KH
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Pakhomov, Andrei G.;Shevin, Rachael;Schoenbach, Karl H.
通讯作者:
Schoenbach, Karl H.