Chromosome-breakage genomic instability and chromothripsis in breast cancer.
Chromosome-breakage genomic instability and chromothripsis in breast cancer.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1186/1471-2164-15-579
复制
发表时间:
2014-07-09
期刊:
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Basik M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Przybytkowski E;Lenkiewicz E;Barrett MT;Klein K;Nabavi S;Greenwood CM;Basik M
Chromosomal breakage followed by faulty DNA repair leads to gene amplifications and deletions in cancers. However, the mere assessment of the extent of genomic changes, amplifications and deletions may reduce the complexity of genomic data observed by array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH). We present here a novel approach to array CGH data analysis, which focuses on putative breakpoints responsible for rearrangements within the genome. We performed array comparative genomic hybridization in 29 primary tumors from high risk patients with breast cancer. The specimens were flow sorted according to ploidy to increase tumor cell purity prior to array CGH. We describe the number of chromosomal breaks as well as the patterns of breaks on individual chromosomes in each tumor. There were differences in chromosomal breakage patterns between the 3 clinical subtypes of breast cancers, although the highest density of breaks occurred at chromosome 17 in all subtypes, suggesting a particular proclivity of this chromosome for breaks. We also observed chromothripsis affecting various chromosomes in 41% of high risk breast cancers. Our results provide a new insight into the genomic complexity of breast cancer. Genomic instability dependent on chromosomal breakage events is not stochastic, targeting some chromosomes clearly more than others. We report a much higher percentage of chromothripsis than described previously in other cancers and this suggests that massive genomic rearrangements occurring in a single catastrophic event may shape many breast cancer genomes. The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-579) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
Rausch T;Jones DT;Zapatka M;Stütz AM;Zichner T;Weischenfeldt J;Jäger N;Remke M;Shih D;Northcott PA;Pfaff E;Tica J;Wang Q;Massimi L;Witt H;Bender S;Pleier S;Cin H;Hawkins C;Beck C;von Deimling A;Hans V;Brors B;Eils R;Scheurlen W;Blake J;Benes V;Kulozik AE;Witt O;Martin D;Zhang C;Porat R;Merino DM;Wasserman J;Jabado N;Fontebasso A;Bullinger L;Rücker FG;Döhner K;Döhner H;Koster J;Molenaar JJ;Versteeg R;Kool M;Tabori U;Malkin D;Korshunov A;Taylor MD;Lichter P;Pfister SM;Korbel JO
通讯作者:
Korbel JO
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Curtis, Christina;Shah, Sohrab P.;Chin, Suet-Feung;Turashvili, Gulisa;Rueda, Oscar M.;Dunning, Mark J.;Speed, Doug;Lynch, Andy G.;Samarajiwa, Shamith;Yuan, Yinyin;Graef, Stefan;Ha, Gavin;Haffari, Gholamreza;Bashashati, Ali;Russell, Roslin;McKinney, Steven;Langerod, Anita;Green, Andrew;Provenzano, Elena;Wishart, Gordon;Pinder, Sarah;Watson, Peter;Markowetz, Florian;Murphy, Leigh;Ellis, Ian;Purushotham, Arnie;Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise;Brenton, James D.;Tavare, Simon;Caldas, Carlos;Aparicio, Samuel
通讯作者:
Aparicio, Samuel
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
Maher CA;Wilson RK
通讯作者:
Wilson RK
影响因子:
6.6
作者:
Kwei KA;Kung Y;Salari K;Holcomb IN;Pollack JR
通讯作者:
Pollack JR
影响因子:
20.3
作者:
Magrangeas, Florence;Avet-Loiseau, Herve;Minvielle, Stephane
通讯作者:
Minvielle, Stephane