Seeking a deeper understanding of 'distributed health literacy': A systematic review.
Seeking a deeper understanding of 'distributed health literacy': A systematic review.
复制标题
寻求对“分布式健康素养”的更深入理解：一项系统性综述。
DOI：
10.1111/hex.13450
复制
发表时间：
2022-06
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Maindal, Helle T.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Muscat, Danielle M.;Gessler, Danielle;Ayre, Julie;Norgaard, Ole;Heuck, Iben R.;Haar, Stefanie;Maindal, Helle T.
以前的研究表明，这将是有益的健康素养视为一套“分布式能力”，可以发现分散在个人的社会网络，而不是一个专门的个人属性。然而，到目前为止，还没有集中探讨如何在同行评议的文献中定义，概念化或评估分布式健康素养。本系统性综述旨在探讨：（1）同行评议文献中提供的分布式健康素养的定义和概念模型;（2）如何在实证研究中测量分布式健康素养。我们使用关键词“识字”和“分布”的截断版本（在五个词的距离内）检索MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycInfo、Scopus、ERIC和Web of Science。我们整理了分布式健康素养的定义和概念模型，并报告了如何在实证研究中测量健康素养。使用专题综合法对纳入手稿的分布式健康素养相关调查结果进行了综合。在筛选的642项研究中，有10项被纳入本系统综述。大多数是报告五个国家之一的定性研究的经验性手稿，有两份评论，一份概念分析和一份定量研究。爱德华兹的分布式健康素养的定义，强调健康素养的能力，技能和其他人的做法，有助于个人的健康素养水平被广泛应用于各种临床和地理环境。然而，我们没有发现任何直接测量分布式健康素养的定量工具。用于定性探讨这一概念的问题存在很大差异，不同研究在以下方面存在差异：（a）什么构成分布式健康素养，什么不构成分布式健康素养（例如，一般社会支持），以及（B）分布式健康素养与其他结构（例如，公共卫生知识）。虽然有一个广泛应用的分布式健康素养的定义，我们的审查显示，研究空间将受益于概念的发展，无论是理论上，例如通过分布式健康素养和其他类型的社会支持之间的概念区别，并通过经验，例如通过定量测量工具的发展。本文是一项系统性综述，不涉及患者或公众。
Previous research suggests that it would be useful to view health literacy as a set of ‘distributed competencies’, which can be found dispersed through the individual's social network, rather than an exclusively individual attribute. However, to date there is no focused exploration of how distributed health literacy has been defined, conceptualized or assessed in the peer‐reviewed literature. This systematic review aimed to explore: (1) definitions and conceptual models of distributed health literacy that are available from the peer‐reviewed literature; and (2) how distributed health literacy has been measured in empirical research. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Scopus, ERIC and Web of Science using truncated versions of the keywords ‘literacy’ and ‘distributed’ (within five words' distance). We collated the definitions and conceptual models of distributed health literacy, and report on how health literacy has been measured in empirical research studies. Findings related to distributed health literacy from included manuscripts were synthesized using thematic synthesis. Of the 642 studies screened, 10 were included in this systematic review. The majority were empirical manuscripts reporting on qualitative research in one of five countries, with two reviews, one conceptual analysis and one quantitative study. Edwards' definition of distributed health literacy, which emphasizes the health literacy abilities, skills and practices of others that contribute to an individual's level of health literacy was widely applied in a variety of clinical and geographical settings. However, we did not identify any quantitative instruments which directly measured distributed health literacy. There was significant variability in questions used to explore the concept qualitatively, and discrepancies across studies in regard to (a) what constitutes distributed health literacy and what does not (e.g., general social support), and (b) the relationship between distributed health literacy and other constructs (e.g., public health literacy). Although there is a widely applied definition of distributed health literacy, our review revealed that the research space would benefit from the development of the concept, both theoretically for example via conceptual distinctions between distributed health literacy and other types of social support, and empirically for example through the development of a quantitative measurement instrument. This paper is a systematic review and did not involve patients or the public.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Osborne RH;Batterham RW;Elsworth GR;Hawkins M;Buchbinder R
通讯作者：
Buchbinder R
DOI：
10.1097/xeb.0000000000000062
发表时间：
2015-09-01
影响因子：
--
作者：
Lockwood, Craig;Munn, Zachary;Porritt, Kylie
通讯作者：
Porritt, Kylie
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph16183417
发表时间：
2019-09-02
影响因子：
--
作者：
Broeder, Janine;Okan, Orkan;Bauer, Ullrich
通讯作者：
Bauer, Ullrich
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Edwards, Michelle;Wood, Fiona;Edwards, Adrian
通讯作者：
Edwards, Adrian
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
PARKER, RM;BAKER, DW;NURSS, JR
通讯作者：
NURSS, JR