Paranoia and self-concepts in psychosis: A systematic review of the literature
Paranoia and self-concepts in psychosis: A systematic review of the literature
复制标题
精神病中的偏执和自我概念：文献的系统回顾
DOI：
10.1016/j.psychres.2014.02.003
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
11.3
通讯作者：
Ciaran Shannon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bridget Tiernan;Rebecca Tracey;Ciaran Shannon
本研究的目的是系统地回顾，探讨自我概念和精神病偏执之间的关系的研究。由两名独立评分员在相关数据库（MedLine、PsychInfo和Web of Science）中进行文献检索，并交叉引用符合纳入标准的文章。根据纳入标准进行审查后，选择了18项研究进行审查。一个叙事合成的结果，其中方法的变异性进行了讨论，提出相对于三个关键领域：偏执狂和自我概念之间的关系的性质;偏执狂和自我概念的差异之间的关联;偏执狂和自我概念之间的关系的性质时，考虑到这些结构的其他方面。系统的文献综述表明相对一致的结果，偏执狂与更多的负面自我概念时，测量横截面。关于偏执狂和自我概念差异的研究结果有些复杂。研究调查维度方面的自我概念和偏执产生的结果特别感兴趣的，特别是在关于不稳定的自我概念和偏执之间的关联表示。在研究和本系统评价的局限性进行了讨论。临床和理论研究结果的影响进行了概述，并为未来的研究提出了可能的方向。
The purpose of the present study was to review systematically, research exploring the relationship between self-concepts and paranoia in psychosis. A literature search was performed by two independent raters in relevant databases (MedLine, PsychInfo and Web of Science) and articles meeting the inclusion criteria were cross-referenced. Following scrutiny according to inclusion criteria, 18 studies were selected for review. A narrative synthesis of findings, in which methodological variability is discussed, is presented relative to three key areas: the nature of the relationship between paranoia and self-concepts; the association between paranoia and discrepancies in self-concepts; the nature of the relationship between paranoia and self-concepts when other, dimensional aspects of these constructs are taken into account. The systematic literature review indicated relatively consistent findings, that paranoia is associated with more negative self-concepts when measured cross-sectionally. Results are somewhat more mixed in regards to research on paranoia and self-concept discrepancies. Studies investigating dimensional aspects of self-concepts and paranoia yield findings of particular interest, especially in regards to the association indicated between instability of self-concepts and paranoia. Limitations in research and of the present systematic review are discussed. Clinical and theoretical implications of findings are outlined and possible directions for future research are suggested.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Greenwald, AG;Nosek, BA;Banaji, MR
通讯作者：
Banaji, MR
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Greenwald, AG;McGhee, DE;Schwartz, JLK
通讯作者：
Schwartz, JLK
社会倾向/自主性和依赖/自我批评与 DSM-III-R 人格障碍的关系。
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Ouimette,PC;Klein,DN;Anderson,R;Riso,LP;Lizardi,H
通讯作者：
Lizardi,H
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
J. Bosson;W. Swann;J. Pennebaker
通讯作者：
J. Bosson;W. Swann;J. Pennebaker