Motivated Shifting of Justice Standards
Motivated Shifting of Justice Standards
复制标题
司法标准的有动机的转变
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
M. Biernat
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Anca M. Miron;N. Branscombe;M. Biernat
三项研究测试了群体成员是否战略性地改变了他们用来决定特定群体行为是否不公正的判断标准。在研究1中，高认同感的个体比低认同感的个体设定了更高的确认性不公正标准--他们需要更多的证据来得出他们的群体行为不公正的结论。这导致对伤害的判断减少，集体负罪感减少。在研究2中，对群体认同进行了实验操作，重复了研究1的结果。在研究3中，对这一过程的激励性质提供了更有力的支持。具体地说，通过为小组成员提供在小组一级自我肯定的机会，降低了向上调整标准的动机。自我肯定的参与者设定了较低的不公正确认性标准，将伤害评级为更严重，并经历了比不自我肯定的参与者更大的集体负罪感。本文还讨论了这一定量标准转移的意义。
Three studies test whether group members strategically shift the standard of judgment they use to decide whether a particular ingroup action was unjust. In Study 1, individuals who were highly identified with their ingroup set higher confirmatory injustice standards than low identifiers—they needed more evidence to conclude that their group acted unjustly. This led to reductions in judgments of harm and diminished collective guilt. In Study 2, group identification was experimentally manipulated and the results of Study 1 were replicated. In Study 3, stronger support is provided for the motivational nature of this process. Specifically, the motivation to shift the standard upward was decreased by providing group members with an opportunity to self-affirm at the group level. Participants who self-affirmed set lower confirmatory standards of injustice, rated the harm as more severe, and experienced greater collective guilt than, those not self-affirming. Implications of this quantitative standard shifting are discussed.
从成功中获得更多：提高标准作为维护尊重。
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Eidelman,Scott;Biernat,Monica
通讯作者：
Biernat,Monica
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Biernat, M;Kobrynowicz, D
通讯作者：
Kobrynowicz, D
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
BIERNAT, M;MANIS, M
通讯作者：
MANIS, M