The illusion of transparency: biased assessments of others' ability to read one's emotional states.

The illusion of transparency: biased assessments of others' ability to read one's emotional states.
复制标题

透明度错觉:对他人解读自己情绪状态的能力进行有偏见的评估。

DOI:
10.1037//0022-3514.75.2.332
复制
发表时间:
1998
影响因子:
7.6
通讯作者:
Medvec,VH
Medvec,VH
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gilovich,T;Savitsky,K;Medvec,VH

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

三组研究提供了证据,证明了一种透明的错觉,即人们高估了别人能在多大程度上辨别自己的内心状态。人们常常错误地认为,他们的内部状态比实际情况更容易“泄露”出来。作者将这种偏见归因于一种倾向,即当人们试图从他人的角度出发时,不能充分地从自己现象学经验的“锚”中进行调整。这种错觉的证据是,说谎者高估了他们谎言的可识别性(研究1a、1b和1c),人们认为他们的厌恶情绪比实际情况更明显(研究2a和2b)。最后一对实验(研究3a和3b)探索了透明度错觉对人们在紧急情况下不愿干预的影响。所有3组研究也提供了与拟议的锚定和调整解释一致的证据。
Three sets of studies provide evidence for an illusion of transparency, or a tendency for people to overestimate the extent to which others can discern their internal states. People often mistakenly believe that their internal states “leak out” more than they really do. The authors attribute this bias to a tendency for people to adjust insufficiently from the “anchor” of their own phenomenological experience when attempting to take another's perspective. Evidence for this illusion is provided by showing that liars overestimate the detectability of their lies (Studies 1a, 1b, and 1c) and that people believe their feelings of disgust are more apparent than they actually are (Studies 2a and 2b). A final pair of experiments (Studies 3a and 3b) explores the implications of the illusion of transparency for people's reluctance to intervene in emergencies. All 3 sets of studies also provide evidence consistent with the proposed anchoring and adjustment interpretation.
谈判中目标的感知与实际透明度
DOI: 10.1177/0146167298244004
发表时间: 1998
影响因子: 4
作者:
J. D. Vorauer;S. Claude
通讯作者: S. Claude
自我关注并站在他人的角度思考
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(83)90005-7
发表时间: 1983
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
B. Stephenson;R. A. Wicklund
通讯作者: R. A. Wicklund
过度归因和单位形成:当行为吞噬人时。
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.4.593
发表时间: 1982
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
George A. Quattrone
通讯作者: George A. Quattrone
自我意识和感觉透明:无法压抑自己
DOI: --
发表时间: 1999
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
J. D. Vorauer;M. Ross
通讯作者: M. Ross
当社会比较出错时:多元无知的情况。
DOI: --
发表时间: 1991
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Dale T. Miller;C. McFarland
通讯作者: C. McFarland