Smartphone based behavioral therapy for pain in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients: A feasibility acceptability randomized controlled study for the treatment of comorbid migraine and ms pain.
Smartphone based behavioral therapy for pain in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients: A feasibility acceptability randomized controlled study for the treatment of comorbid migraine and ms pain.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.msard.2020.102489
复制
发表时间:
2020-11
影响因子:
4
通讯作者:
Morio K
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Minen MT;Schaubhut KB;Morio K
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Migraine are comorbid neurologic conditions. Migraine prevalence is three times higher in the MS clinic population compared to the general population, and patients with MS and migraine are more symptomatic than patients with MS without migraine. We sought to conduct a pilot feasibility and acceptability study of the RELAXaHEAD app in MS-Migraine patients and to assess whether there was any change in migraine disability and MS pain-related disability. Randomized controlled study of patients with MS-migraine ages 18–80 years with 4+ headache days/ month who were willing to engage in smartphone based behavioral therapy. Half received the RELAXaHEAD app with progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) and the other half received the app without the PMR. Data was collected for 90 days on measures of recruitment, retention, engagement, and adherence to RELAXaHEAD. Preliminary data was also collected on migraine disability (MIDAS) and MS pain (PES). Sixty-two subjects with MS-migraine were enrolled in the study (34 in PMR arm, 28 in monitored usual care arm). On average, during the 90 days, participants played the PMR on average 1.8 times per week, and for 12.9 minutes on days it was played. Forty-one percent (14/34) of the participants played the PMR two or more times weekly on average. Data was entered into the daily diaries, on average, 49% (44/90) of the days. There were major challenges in reaching subjects in follow-up for the efficacy data, and there was no significant change in migraine disability (MIDAS) scores or MS Pain (PES) scores from baseline to the endpoints. During the six-month follow-up, most patients felt either positively or neutral about the relaxation therapy. There was interest in scalable accessible forms of behavioral therapy to treat migraine and MS-related pain in patients with MS and comorbid migraine. Similar to prior studies, a significant minority were willing to practice the PMR at least twice weekly. In the societal shift from telephone to more text and internet-based interactions, follow up was challenging, but those reached indicated that they appreciated the PMR and would recommend it to others. Future work should focus on engagement and efficacy.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
GUSTAFSON, R
通讯作者:
GUSTAFSON, R
DOI:
10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30299-5
发表时间:
2017-11
期刊:
The Lancet. Neurology
影响因子:
--
作者:
GBD 2015 Neurological Disorders Collaborator Group
通讯作者:
GBD 2015 Neurological Disorders Collaborator Group
影响因子:
7.4
作者:
Kister, Ilya;Caminero, A. B.;Monteith, T. S.;Soliman, A.;Bacon, T. E.;Bacon, J. H.;Kalina, J. T.;Inglese, M.;Herbert, J.;Lipton, R. B.
通讯作者:
Lipton, R. B.
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Andrasik, F.
通讯作者:
Andrasik, F.
DOI:
10.1177/2055217315585333
发表时间:
2015-01-01
影响因子:
--
作者:
Heesen, Christoph;Bruce, Jared;Bissell, Paul
通讯作者:
Bissell, Paul