Assessing Anger Expression: Construct Validity of Three Emotion Expression-Related Measures.
Assessing Anger Expression: Construct Validity of Three Emotion Expression-Related Measures.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/00223891.2016.1178650
复制
发表时间：
2016-11
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Burns JW
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jasinski MJ;Lumley MA;Latsch DV;Schuster E;Kinner E;Burns JW
情绪表达的自我报告措施是常见的，但其有效性预测客观的情绪表达，特别是愤怒，是不清楚的。我们测试了愤怒表达量表（AEI）、情绪应对量表（EAC）和多伦多述情障碍量表-20（TAS-20）在预测95名慢性背痛成人的客观愤怒表达方面的有效性。参与者试图通过遵循一个对他们粗暴和不公正的同伙的指示来解决一个困难的计算机迷宫。然后，参与者表达了他们的感受4分钟。不知情的评分者对视频中的愤怒表达进行编码，一个软件程序分析了与愤怒相关的词语的表达转录。分析涉及每个问卷的愤怒表达。正如预期的那样，AEI愤怒量表预测了更大的愤怒表达，但AEI愤怒没有。EAC情绪处理量表预测愤怒表达较少，但EAC情绪表达量表与愤怒表达无关。最后，TAS-20预测更大的愤怒表达。研究结果支持AEI愤怒量表的有效性，但提出了其他措施的问题。通过自我报告对情绪表达的评估是复杂的，可能会受到一般情绪体验、所评估情绪的特异性或普遍性以及自我意识局限性的混淆。需要基于表现或临床医生评定的情绪表达措施。
Self-report measures of emotional expression are common, but their validity to predict objective emotional expression, particularly of anger, is unclear. We tested the validity of the Anger Expression Inventory (AEI)), Emotional Approach Coping Scale (EAC), and Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20) to predict objective anger expression in 95 adults with chronic back pain. Participants attempted to solve a difficult computer maze by following the directions of a confederate who treated them rudely and unjustly. Participants then expressed their feelings for 4 minutes. Blinded raters coded the videos for anger expression, and a software program analyzed expression transcripts for anger-related words. Analyses related each questionnaire to anger expression. The AEI anger-out scale predicted greater anger expression, as expected, but AEI anger-in did not. The EAC emotional processing scale predicted less anger expression, but the EAC emotional expression scale was unrelated to anger expression. Finally, the TAS-20 predicted greater anger expression. Findings support the validity of the AEI anger-out scale but raise questions about the other measures. The assessment of emotional expression by self-report is complex and perhaps confounded by general emotional experience, the specificity or generality of the emotion(s) assessed, and self-awareness limitations. Performance-based or clinician-rated measures of emotion expression are needed.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Bums, John W.;Quartana, Phillip;Lofland, Kenneth
通讯作者：
Lofland, Kenneth
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Clark, LA;Watson, D
通讯作者：
Watson, D
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
KERNS, RD;ROSENBERG, R;JACOB, MC
通讯作者：
JACOB, MC
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Everson, SA;Goldberg, DE;Salonen, JT
通讯作者：
Salonen, JT
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Ganellen, Ronald J.
通讯作者：
Ganellen, Ronald J.