Hardiness and stress moderation: a test of proposed mechanisms.

Hardiness and stress moderation: a test of proposed mechanisms.
复制标题

坚韧和压力调节:对所提出机制的测试。

DOI:
10.1037//0022-3514.60.1.89
复制
发表时间:
1991
影响因子:
7.6
通讯作者:
Deborah J. Wiebe
Deborah J. Wiebe
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Deborah J. Wiebe

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

高和低的哈代男性和女性大学生完成了一个评价性威胁任务,操纵影响评价的任务,以符合耐寒理论的方式。高哈代被试比低哈代被试表现出更高的挫折容忍度,评价任务的威胁性较小,并以更多的积极和更少的消极情绪来应对任务。尽管所有受试者在完成实验任务时心率都有所增加,但高哈代耐力的人在完成任务时心率升高的程度低于低哈代耐力的人。坚韧性并没有影响妇女的人力资源的反应。操纵任务评价揭示了一个类似的模式,在高坚韧性评价条件下的男性在任务过程中表现出较低水平的生理唤醒比男性在低坚韧性评价条件。在女性中,评价操作要么没有效果,要么效果相反。
High and low hardy male and female undergraduates completed an evaluative threat task that was manipulated to influence appraisals of the task in a manner consistent with hardiness theory. High hardy subjects displayed higher frustration tolerance, appraised the task as less threatening, and responded to the task with more positive and less negative affect than did low hardy subjects. Although all subjects displayed increased heart rate (HR) in response to the experimental task, high hardy men displayed lower HR elevations during the task than did low hardy men. Hardiness did not influence HR responses among women. Manipulations of task appraisal revealed a similar pattern where men in the high hardiness appraisal conditions displayed lower levels of physiological arousal during the task than did men in the low hardiness appraisal conditions. Appraisal manipulations had either no effect or the opposite effect among women.
生活压力与健康:抗压中的性格、应对方式和家庭支持。
DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.49.3.739
发表时间: 1985
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Holahan,CJ;Moos,RH
通讯作者: Moos,RH