Advantages of closed-loop calibration in intracortical brain-computer interfaces for people with tetraplegia.
Advantages of closed-loop calibration in intracortical brain-computer interfaces for people with tetraplegia.
复制标题
对于四肢瘫痪患者,在心脏内脑机构界面中闭环校准的优点。
DOI:
10.1088/1741-2560/10/4/046012
复制
发表时间:
2013-08
影响因子:
4
通讯作者:
Hochberg LR
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jarosiewicz B;Masse NY;Bacher D;Cash SS;Eskandar E;Friehs G;Donoghue JP;Hochberg LR
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) aim to provide a means for people with severe motor disabilities to control their environment directly with neural activity. In intracortical BCIs for people with tetraplegia, the decoder that maps neural activity to desired movements has typically been calibrated using “open-loop” (OL) imagination of control while a cursor automatically moves to targets on a computer screen. However, because neural activity can vary across contexts, a decoder calibrated using OL data may not be optimal for “closed-loop” (CL) neural control. Here, we tested whether CL calibration creates a better decoder than OL calibration even when all other factors that might influence performance are held constant, including the amount of data used for calibration and the amount of elapsed time between calibration and testing. Two people with tetraplegia enrolled in the BrainGate2 pilot clinical trial performed a center-out-back task using an intracortical BCI, switching between decoders that had been calibrated on OL vs. CL data. Even when all other variables were held constant, CL calibration improved neural control as well as the accuracy and strength of the tuning model. Updating the CL decoder using additional and more recent data resulted in further improvements. Differences in neural activity between OL and CL contexts contribute to the superiority of CL decoders, even prior to their additional “adaptive” advantage. In the near future, CL decoder calibration may enable robust neural control without needing to pause ongoing, practical use of BCIs, an important step toward clinical utility.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Ethier, C.;Oby, E. R.;Bauman, M. J.;Miller, L. E.
通讯作者:
Miller, L. E.
影响因子:
4
作者:
Chestek CA;Gilja V;Nuyujukian P;Foster JD;Fan JM;Kaufman MT;Churchland MM;Rivera-Alvidrez Z;Cunningham JP;Ryu SI;Shenoy KV
通讯作者:
Shenoy KV
DOI:
10.1016/j.neunet.2009.05.005
发表时间:
2009-11
期刊:
Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society
影响因子:
--
作者:
Chase SM;Schwartz AB;Kass RE
通讯作者:
Kass RE
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1215092109
发表时间:
2012-10-16
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Hauschild, Markus;Mulliken, Grant H.;Andersen, Richard A.
通讯作者:
Andersen, Richard A.
影响因子:
2
作者:
Edeline, JM
通讯作者:
Edeline, JM