Complex nonverbal response inhibition and stopping impulsivity in childhood stuttering.
Complex nonverbal response inhibition and stopping impulsivity in childhood stuttering.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105877
复制
发表时间：
2021-12
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Anderson JD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ofoe LC;Anderson JD
本研究的主要目的是检查复杂的非言语反应抑制和停止冲动的儿童谁做（CWS）和不口吃（CWNS）。共有30名CWS和30名CWNS年龄在3;1和6;0（岁;月）之间进行了钉攻任务（PTT），其中儿童被要求在检查者敲击两次时敲击一次钉，反之亦然。主要的因变量是练习试验的次数、反应准确性、准确反应的反应潜伏期和额外敲击的次数（即，点击两次以上）。与CWNS相比，CWS在PTT上的准确性较低，速度较慢，在实践试验的数量上没有差异。此外，CWS，特别是男孩，比CWNS产生更多的额外水龙头。研究结果显示，学龄前CWS有弱点，在复杂反应抑制和停止冲动的非言语领域相比，CWNS。综上所述，这些研究结果沿着与以前的研究表明，CWS可能有弱点的抑制和冲动在非语言领域以及语言领域，这表明一个域的一般弱点。
The primary purpose of this study was to examine complex nonverbal response inhibition and stopping impulsivity in children who do (CWS) and do not stutter (CWNS). A total of 30 CWS and 30 CWNS between the ages of 3;1 and 6;0 (years; months) performed the Peg-Tapping Task (PTT), in which children were required to tap a dowel once when an examiner taps twice and vice versa. The main dependent variables were the number of practice trials, response accuracy, response latency for accurate responses, and the number of extra taps (i.e., tapping more than two times). The CWS were less accurate and slower on the PTT than the CWNS, with no differences in the number of practice trials. Furthermore, the CWS, especially boys, produced more extra taps than the CWNS. Findings revealed that preschool CWS have weaknesses in complex response inhibition and stopping impulsivity in the nonverbal domain compared to CWNS. Taken together, these findings along with those of previous studies indicate that CWS may have weaknesses in inhibition and impulsivity in the nonverbal domain as well as the verbal domain, suggesting a domain-general weakness.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Bezdjian, Serena;Baker, Laura A.;Raine, Adrian
通讯作者：
Raine, Adrian
DOI：
10.1044/2016_jslhr-s-16-0135
发表时间：
2017-04-01
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Anderson, Julie D.;Wagovich, Stacy A.
通讯作者：
Wagovich, Stacy A.
DOI：
10.1044/1092-4388(2003/095
发表时间：
2003-10-01
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Anderson, JD;Pellowski, MW;Kelly, EM
通讯作者：
Kelly, EM
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Anderson, Julie D.;Wagovich, Stacy A.
通讯作者：
Wagovich, Stacy A.
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Best JR;Miller PH
通讯作者：
Miller PH