Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.
Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.
复制标题
图片命名中语义干扰的轨迹：来自双任务表现的证据。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
H. Schriefers
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Vitória Piai;Ardi Roelofs;H. Schriefers
对图片命名中干扰词语义干扰的功能轨迹存在分歧。这种效应是现代词汇产生心理语言学模型的基石，该模型假设它产生于词汇反应选择。然而，最近来自双任务表现研究的证据表明，在词汇反应选择之前，在知觉或概念加工中存在一个位点。在这些研究中，参与者手动对一种语气做出反应，并为一幅画命名，而忽略了一个书面的干扰词。对声调刺激和图词刺激之间的刺激启动异步性进行了控制。命名延迟的语义干扰在长音调暴露前soa中存在，但在短音调soa中减少或不存在。在双任务绩效的结构性或战略性反应选择瓶颈和中心容量共享模型下，SOA和刺激类型效应的低可加性表明语义干扰先于词汇反应选择出现。然而，在最近的研究中，得到了SOA和刺激类型的叠加效应。在这里，我们通过6个实验检验了这些研究结果之间的差异，在这些实验中，我们系统地操纵了这些早期研究不同的各个维度，包括任务、材料、刺激类型和soa。在所有的实验中，我们都得到了SOA和刺激类型对命名延迟的叠加效应。这些结果表明，语义干扰效应发生在知觉和概念加工之后、词汇反应选择过程中或之后。我们讨论了几个理论的替代方案，就他们的潜力，以说明目前的结果和其他研究之间的差异显示欠加性。
Disagreement exists regarding the functional locus of semantic interference of distractor words in picture naming. This effect is a cornerstone of modern psycholinguistic models of word production, which assume that it arises in lexical response-selection. However, recent evidence from studies of dual-task performance suggests a locus in perceptual or conceptual processing, prior to lexical response-selection. In these studies, participants manually responded to a tone and named a picture while ignoring a written distractor word. The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between tone and picture-word stimulus was manipulated. Semantic interference in naming latencies was present at long tone pre-exposure SOAs, but reduced or absent at short SOAs. Under the prevailing structural or strategic response-selection bottleneck and central capacity sharing models of dual-task performance, the underadditivity of the effects of SOA and stimulus type suggests that semantic interference emerges before lexical response-selection. However, in more recent studies, additive effects of SOA and stimulus type were obtained. Here, we examined the discrepancy in results between these studies in 6 experiments in which we systematically manipulated various dimensions on which these earlier studies differed, including tasks, materials, stimulus types, and SOAs. In all our experiments, additive effects of SOA and stimulus type on naming latencies were obtained. These results strongly suggest that the semantic interference effect arises after perceptual and conceptual processing, during lexical response-selection or later. We discuss several theoretical alternatives with respect to their potential to account for the discrepancy between the present results and other studies showing underadditivity.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Miozzo, M;Caramazza, A
通讯作者：
Caramazza, A
解决词语生成过程中的语义干扰需要集中注意力。
DOI：
10.1037/a0033095
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子：
--
作者：
Kleinman,Daniel
通讯作者：
Kleinman,Daniel
对单个物体做出两种反应：对中央注意力瓶颈的影响。
DOI：
10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.1058
发表时间：
1992
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
影响因子：
--
作者：
Fagot,C;Pashler,H
通讯作者：
Pashler,H
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.249
发表时间：
2008-01-01
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Janssen, Niels;Schirm, Walter;Caramazza, Alfonso
通讯作者：
Caramazza, Alfonso