Comparison of blue light-filtering IOLs and UV light-filtering IOLs for cataract surgery: a meta-analysis.
Comparison of blue light-filtering IOLs and UV light-filtering IOLs for cataract surgery: a meta-analysis.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0033013
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Zhao NQ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhu XF;Zou HD;Yu YF;Sun Q;Zhao NQ
A number of published randomized controlled trials have been conducted to evaluate visual performance of blue light-filtering intraocular lenses (IOL) and UV light-filtering intraocular lenses (IOL) after cataract phacoemulsification surgery. However, results have not always been consistent. Therefore, we carried out a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of blue light-filtering IOLs versus UV light-filtering IOLs in cataract surgery. Comprehensive searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and the Chinese BioMedical literature databases were performed using web-based search engines. Fifteen trials (1690 eyes) were included for systematic review, and 11 of 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that there were no significant differences in postoperative mean best corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, overall color vision, or in the blue light spectrum under photopic light conditions between blue light-filtering IOLs and UV light-filtering IOLs [WMD = −0.01, 95%CI (−0.03, 0.01), P = 0.46; WMD = 0.07, 95%CI (−0.04, 0.19), P = 0.20; SMD = 0.14, 95%CI (−0.33, 0.60), P = 0.566; SMD = 0.20, 95%CI (−0.04, 0.43), P = 0.099]. However, color vision with blue light-filtering IOLs was significantly reduced in the blue light spectrum under mesopic light conditions [SMD = 0.74, 95%CI (0.29, 1.18), P = 0.001]. This meta-analysis demonstrates that postoperative visual performance with blue light-filtering IOLs is approximately equal to that of UV light-filtering IOLs after cataract surgery, but color vision with blue light-filtering IOLs demonstrated some compromise in the blue light spectrum under mesopic light conditions.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Bhattacharjee, H;Bhattacharjee, K;Medhi, J
通讯作者:
Medhi, J
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Mester, Ulrich;Holz, Frank;Tetz, Manfred
通讯作者:
Tetz, Manfred
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Rodríguez-Galietero, A;Montés-Micó, R;Albarrán-Diego, C
通讯作者:
Albarrán-Diego, C
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Brockmann, Claudia;Schulz, Marcus;Laube, Thomas
通讯作者:
Laube, Thomas
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
HAM, WT;MUELLER, HA;SLINEY, DH
通讯作者:
SLINEY, DH