Children's Social Desirability: Effects of Test Assessment Mode.
Children's Social Desirability: Effects of Test Assessment Mode.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.039
复制
发表时间：
2015-09
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Finney CJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Miller PH;Baxter SD;Royer JA;Hitchcock DB;Smith AF;Collins KL;Guinn CH;Smith AL;Puryear MP;Vaadi KK;Finney CJ
本研究对157名四年级儿童进行了最近开发的儿童社会期望（CSD-S）量表。我们感兴趣的是a)一个月的测试重测信度是否会随着测试评估模式（面试或课堂）、性别、种族、社会经济地位和BMI百分位数的变化而变化，以及b)社会期望程度是否会随着这些相同变量的变化而变化。CSD-S量表在访谈和课堂评估模式下均表现出良好的重测信度。85和。83年,分别)。内部一致性也很好（第一次面谈管理= .84；第一次课堂管理= .81）。信度良好，在评估模式或任何儿童亚组变量上没有显著差异，表明CSD-S量表适合一般使用。与课堂模式相比，访谈模式得到了更多社会期望的答案。社会期望在儿童亚组之间没有差异。其中一些发现在另一个样本上得到了检验和重复。因此，CSD-S量表可以用于不同的儿童群体，以a)可靠地评估社会可取性偏差，这种偏差可能会系统地影响研究人员感兴趣的其他自我报告；b)检查社会可取性程度的个体差异。
This study examined a recently developed short version of the Children’s Social Desirability (CSD-S) scale with 157 fourth-grade children. Of interest was a) whether one-month test-retest reliability would vary as a function of test assessment mode (interview or classroom), gender, race, SES, and BMI percentile, and b) whether the degree of social desirability would vary as a function of these same variables. The CSD-S scale showed good test-retest reliability for both interview and classroom assessment modes (.85 and .83, respectively). Internal consistency also was good (first interview administration = .84; first classroom administration = .81). Reliability was good and did not vary significantly over assessment mode or any child subgroup variables, suggesting that the CSD-S scale is appropriate for general use. The interview mode elicited significantly more socially desirable answers than did the classroom mode. Social desirability did not differ across child subgroups. Some of these findings were examined, and replicated, on another sample. Thus, the CSD-S scale may be used with diverse groups of children to a) reliably assess a social desirability bias that may systematically bias other self-reports of interest to researchers and b) examine individual differences in degree of social desirability.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
8
作者：
Barlow, Sarah E.
通讯作者：
Barlow, Sarah E.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
CRANDALL, VC
通讯作者：
CRANDALL, VC
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Guinn, Caroline H.;Baxter, Suzanne D.;Smith, Albert F.
通讯作者：
Smith, Albert F.
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Baxter, SD;Smith, AF;Shaffer, NM
通讯作者：
Shaffer, NM
DOI：
10.1037/h0020966
发表时间：
1965-01-01
期刊：
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY
影响因子：
--
作者：
CRANDALL, VC;CRANDALL, VJ;KATKOVSKY, W
通讯作者：
KATKOVSKY, W