Innovation ecosystem: impact of interactive patterns, member location and member heterogeneity on cooperative innovation performance

Innovation ecosystem: impact of interactive patterns, member location and member heterogeneity on cooperative innovation performance
复制标题

创新生态系统:互动模式、成员位置和成员异质性对合作创新绩效的影响

DOI:
10.1080/14479338.2016.1165624
复制
发表时间:
2016-01
期刊:
INNOVATION-MANAGEMENT POLICY & PRACTICE
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Song Juan
Song Juan
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Song Juan

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

创新生态系统的合作创新绩效取决于生态系统成员之间的互动活动。本研究探讨创新生态系统的演化、成员的区位、异质性以及成员间的互动模式对合作创新绩效的影响。构建了互动模型,并对我国铁路运输装备产业进行了仿真实验和实证研究。在定性和定量研究的基础上,我们发现,焦点企业与上游合作伙伴的互动强度比焦点企业与下游合作伙伴的互动强度更有利于合作创新绩效的提高。这些研究结果还表明,创新生态系统的成员的退出降低了合作创新绩效,但是,上游组件合作伙伴的退出的影响更为显着。研究发现,核心厂商与上游厂商对于合作创新绩效皆有正向的影响力。此外,研究还发现,中心企业与上下游合作伙伴之间的非对称关系往往对其合作创新绩效产生更显著的影响,其中,生态系统成员的集中互动模式比分散互动模式产生更高的合作创新绩效。
The cooperative innovation performance of an innovation ecosystem depends on the interactive activities among members of the ecosystem. This study investigates the ways in which the evolution of an innovation ecosystem, member locations, heterogeneity and the pattern of interaction among members affect cooperative innovation performance. We build an interaction model and conduct a simulation experiment and empirical research on China’s railway transportation equipment industry. On the basis of a qualitative and quantitative investigation, we find that the interactive strength of focal firms and their upstream partners is more beneficial to cooperative innovation performance than the interactive strength of focal firms and their downstream partners. These findings also suggest that the exit of members of an innovation ecosystem decreases cooperative innovation performance; however, the effect of the exit of upstream component partners is more significant. We conclude that both the focal and the upstream component firms have positive influential power toward the cooperative innovation performance. In addition, this study suggests that asymmetric relationships between the focal firm and upstream and downstream partners tend to have more significant impact on their cooperative innovation performance, in which a centralized interactive pattern of the ecosystem members generated higher cooperative innovation performance than the dispersed pattern.
DOI: 10.1108/jpbm-01-2013-0241
发表时间: 2014-08
影响因子: 5.6
作者:
Donovan Ray Hardenrbook
通讯作者: Donovan Ray Hardenrbook
DOI: 10.1002/smj.790
发表时间: 2009-12
影响因子: 1.1
作者:
Melanie S Schreiner;P. Kale;D. Corsten
通讯作者: Melanie S Schreiner;P. Kale;D. Corsten
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2006.21318923
发表时间: 2006-07-01
影响因子: 16.4
作者:
Dhanaraj, Charles;Parkhe, Arvind
通讯作者: Parkhe, Arvind
DOI: 10.1002/smj.821
发表时间: 2010-03-01
影响因子: 8.3
作者:
Adner, Ron;Kapoor, Rahul
通讯作者: Kapoor, Rahul
DOI: 10.2307/20159234
发表时间: 2006-07-01
影响因子: 16.4
作者:
Dhanaraj, Charles;Parkhe, Arvind
通讯作者: Parkhe, Arvind