Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology.
Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/ejn.12816
复制
发表时间：
2015-03
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
SanMiguel I
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Schröger E;Marzecová A;SanMiguel I
注意是感知服务中的一种假想机制，它促进了相关信息的加工，抑制了无关信息的加工。预测是一种为感知服务的假设机制，它在解释感觉输入时考虑了先验信息。虽然(注意力和预测)都有助于感知，但很少把它们放在一起考虑。听觉注意力通常会增强大脑活动，而听觉预测往往会导致大脑反应减弱。然而，当强烈预测的声音被省略时，大脑对沉默的反应类似于声音引起的反应。联合调查注意力和预测的研究表明，这些不同的机制可能会相互作用，例如，注意力可能会放大预测和未预测声音之间的加工差异。根据预测编码理论，我们认为预测与从存储在处理层次的较高级别中的预测模型向下发送到较低级别的预测有关，而注意力指的是向上发送到较高级别的预测误差信号的增益调制。由于预测编码了感官数据中的内容和置信度，并且增益可以由听者的意图和输入的可预测性来调节，注意力和预测之间的相互作用的各种可能性可以展开。从这个角度来看，自下而上/外源性和自上而下/内源性驱动注意之间的传统区别可以被重新审视，并可以整合注意力获得和注意力跟踪的经典概念。
Attention is a hypothetical mechanism in the service of perception that facilitates the processing of relevant information and inhibits the processing of irrelevant information. Prediction is a hypothetical mechanism in the service of perception that considers prior information when interpreting the sensorial input. Although both (attention and prediction) aid perception, they are rarely considered together. Auditory attention typically yields enhanced brain activity, whereas auditory prediction often results in attenuated brain responses. However, when strongly predicted sounds are omitted, brain responses to silence resemble those elicited by sounds. Studies jointly investigating attention and prediction revealed that these different mechanisms may interact, e.g. attention may magnify the processing differences between predicted and unpredicted sounds. Following the predictive coding theory, we suggest that prediction relates to predictions sent down from predictive models housed in higher levels of the processing hierarchy to lower levels and attention refers to gain modulation of the prediction error signal sent up to the higher level. As predictions encode contents and confidence in the sensory data, and as gain can be modulated by the intention of the listener and by the predictability of the input, various possibilities for interactions between attention and prediction can be unfolded. From this perspective, the traditional distinction between bottom-up/exogenous and top-down/endogenous driven attention can be revisited and the classic concepts of attentional gain and attentional trace can be integrated.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
19.9
作者：
Awh, Edward;Belopolsky, Artem V.;Theeuwes, Jan
通讯作者：
Theeuwes, Jan
影响因子：
16.2
作者：
Bastos AM;Usrey WM;Adams RA;Mangun GR;Fries P;Friston KJ
通讯作者：
Friston KJ
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
Bidet-Caulet, Aurelie;Mikyska, Constanze;Knight, Robert T.
通讯作者：
Knight, Robert T.
DOI：
10.1016/0013-4694(87)90185-4
发表时间：
1987-02-01
期刊：
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
影响因子：
--
作者：
BOURBON, WT;WILL, KW;PAPANICOLAOU, AC
通讯作者：
PAPANICOLAOU, AC
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Alho, Kimmo;Rinne, Teemu;Woods, David L.
通讯作者：
Woods, David L.