Post retraction citations in context: a case study.
Post retraction citations in context: a case study.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11192-017-2242-0
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Halevi G
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bar-Ilan J;Halevi G
这项研究调查了2014年被撤回的文章的引用性质。在Elsevier全文数据库ScienceDirect中发现的987篇撤回文章中，我们选择了2015年1月至2016年3月期间引用超过10次的所有文章。由于只有大约83%的撤回文章的撤回年份是已知的，我们选择集中在最近的引用，这肯定是在引用论文被撤回之后出现的。总的来说，我们分析了238篇引用文献，并将每篇引用文献的背景确定为积极、消极或中性。我们的研究结果表明，尽管出版商平台上有明确的撤回通知，但绝大多数撤回文章的引用都是积极的，无论撤回的原因如何。由于道德不当行为、数据捏造和虚假报告而被撤回的文章也会被正面引用。根据这些结果，我们为出版商列出了一些建议，这些建议可能会最大限度地减少撤回研究的引用。
This study examines the nature of citations to articles that were retracted in 2014. Out of 987 retracted articles found in ScienceDirect, an Elsevier full text database, we selected all articles that received more than 10 citations between January 2015 and March 2016. Since the retraction year was known for only about 83% of the retracted articles, we chose to concentrate on recent citations, that for certain appeared after the cited paper was retracted. Overall, we analyzed 238 citing documents and identified the context of each citation as positive, negative or neutral. Our results show that the vast majority of citations to retracted articles are positive despite of the clear retraction notice on the publisher’s platform and regardless of the reason for retraction. Positive citations can be also seen to articles that were retracted due to ethical misconduct, data fabrication and false reports. In light of these results, we listed some recommendations for publishers that could potentially minimize the referral to retracted studies as valid.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.9
作者：
Edu-Valsania, Sergio;Antonio Moriano, Juan;Molero, Fernando
通讯作者：
Molero, Fernando
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
Marcus, Adam;Oransky, Ivan
通讯作者：
Oransky, Ivan
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Mayne, ST
通讯作者：
Mayne, ST
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Furman, Jeffrey L.;Jensen, Kyle;Murray, Fiona
通讯作者：
Murray, Fiona
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Redman, B. K.;Yarandi, H. N.;Merz, J. F.
通讯作者：
Merz, J. F.