Integrating Subjective and Objective Dimensions of Resilience in Fire-Prone Landscapes

Integrating Subjective and Objective Dimensions of Resilience in Fire-Prone Landscapes
复制标题

整合易发火灾景观中恢复力的主观和客观维度

DOI:
10.1093/biosci/biz030
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
10.1
通讯作者:
Stedman, Richard C
Stedman, Richard C
中科院分区:
生物学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Higuera, Philip E;Metcalf, Alexander L;Miller, Carol;Buma, Brian;McWethy, David B;Metcalf, Elizabeth C;Ratajczak, Zak;Nelson, Cara R;Chaffin, Brian C;Stedman, Richard C

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

复原力已成为以科学为基础的自然资源管理的一个共同目标,特别是在气候变化和干扰机制的背景下。整合不同的观点和定义的弹性是一个复杂的,往往不被承认的挑战,应用弹性的概念,社会生态系统(SES)管理。以野火为例,我们开发了一个框架,暴露和分离的两个重要方面的弹性:固有的属性,保持结构,功能,或状态的SES和人类的看法理想的或有价值的组件的SES。在这样做时,该框架区分了不受价值影响的复原力和源于人类的、价值明确的复原力。四个原型情景强调,生态恢复力和人类价值观并不总是一致的,认识和预测潜在的不一致是制定有效的管理目标的关键。我们的框架澄清了现有的弹性理论,跨学科的文献连接,并促进在研究和土地管理应用中使用弹性概念。
Resilience has become a common goal for science-based natural resource management, particularly in the context of changing climate and disturbance regimes. Integrating varying perspectives and definitions of resilience is a complex and often unrecognized challenge to applying resilience concepts to social–ecological systems (SESs) management. Using wildfire as an example, we develop a framework to expose and separate two important dimensions of resilience: the inherent properties that maintain structure, function, or states of an SES and the human perceptions of desirable or valued components of an SES. In doing so, the framework distinguishes between value-free and human-derived, value-explicit dimensions of resilience. Four archetypal scenarios highlight that ecological resilience and human values do not always align and that recognizing and anticipating potential misalignment is critical for developing effective management goals. Our framework clarifies existing resilience theory, connects literature across disciplines, and facilitates use of the resilience concept in research and land-management applications.
DOI: 10.1002/fee.1283
发表时间: 2016-06-01
影响因子: 10.3
作者:
Fischer, A. Paige;Spies, Thomas A.;Bowman, David M. J. S.
通讯作者: Bowman, David M. J. S.
DOI: 10.1890/13-0066.1
发表时间: 2013-09-01
影响因子: 5
作者:
Larson, Andrew J.;Belote, R. Travis;Dietz, Matthew S.
通讯作者: Dietz, Matthew S.
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12738
发表时间: 2016
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
I. Smit;G. Asner;N. Govender;N. Vaughn;B. W. Wilgen
通讯作者: B. W. Wilgen
美国西部干旱森林的森林结构和火灾危险
DOI: --
发表时间: 2005
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Peterson;Morris C. Johnson;J. Agee;Theresa B Jain;D. McKenzie;E. Reinhardt
通讯作者: E. Reinhardt
生态学、价值观和客观性:推进辩论
DOI: --
发表时间: 2005
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
T. Wallington;S. Moore
通讯作者: S. Moore