The Ecology of Automaticity
The Ecology of Automaticity
复制标题
自动化的生态学
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Higgins
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Joseph Cesario;Jason E. Plaks;Nao Hagiwara;C. Navarrete;E. Higgins
生态学在自动认知过程和社会行为中发挥什么作用？我们的动机准备账户假设，启动一个社会类别可以让个体做好对该类别的适应性行为反应的准备，即考虑到物理环境的反应。我们提出的第一个证据表明，由社会类别素数自动引发的认知反应（研究 1）和行为反应（研究 2a 和 2b）根据一个人的物理环境而有所不同。具体来说，在用黑人男性（具有威胁性的外群体）的照片启动后，参与者会做出攻击行为（打架）或疏远行为（逃跑）的反应，具体取决于情况允许采取什么行动。例如，当参与者在启动期间坐在封闭的隔间中（不可能有疏远行为）时，他们表现出与战斗相关的动作语义的可访问性增加；然而，当坐在开阔的场地（可能存在疏远行为）时，他们表现出与飞行相关的动作语义的可访问性更高。这些发现表明，对自动化的理解必须考虑其情境性质。
What is the role of ecology in automatic cognitive processes and social behavior? Our motivated-preparation account posits that priming a social category readies the individual for adaptive behavioral responses to that category—responses that take into account the physical environment. We present the first evidence showing that the cognitive responses (Study 1) and the behavioral responses (Studies 2a and 2b) automatically elicited by a social-category prime differ depending on a person’s physical surroundings. Specifically, after priming with pictures of Black men (a threatening out-group), participants responded with either aggressive behavior (fight) or distancing behavior (flight), depending on what action was allowed by the situation. For example, when participants were seated in an enclosed booth (no distancing behavior possible) during priming, they showed increased accessibility of fight-related action semantics; however, when seated in an open field (distancing behavior possible), they showed increased accessibility of flight-related action semantics. These findings suggest that an understanding of automaticity must consider its situated nature.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Cesario, J;Higgins, ET;Plaks, JE
通讯作者：
Plaks, JE
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
FAZIO, RH;JACKSON, JR;WILLIAMS, CJ
通讯作者：
WILLIAMS, CJ
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
BLANCHARD, RJ;FLANNELLY, KJ;BLANCHARD, DC
通讯作者：
BLANCHARD, DC